105,313Records 71,083Employers 85,290Hospitalizations 27,770Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-10-31
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

ARAMIS INC

Federal OSHA safety record across 6 records in 2 states.

Federal OSHA records for ARAMIS INC include 1 Severe Injury Report, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 5 OSHA inspections, spanning 2 states, with incidents dated between and . Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

Compliance History Report ARAMIS INC's full severe-injury history, benchmarked against its sector and the national average — one portable, citable document.
Get the report →
Ongoing Severe-Injury Monitor A private watch page for ARAMIS INC, refreshed daily as new federal OSHA severe injuries are published — with full history and benchmark. $99/mo, cancel anytime.
Start monitoring →

SIR1 record Injuries0 records Inspections5 records

Date range

Most recent 1 of 1 reports for this employer.

Aramis Inc

Event Struck by running powered equipment during maintenance, cleaning, testing

Amputation

No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.

Date range to

Most recent 5 of 5 inspections for this employer.

ARAMIS INC

TypePlanned DisciplineSafety Activity #1032127

ARAMIS INC

TypePlanned DisciplineHealth Activity #11032737

ARAMIS INC

TypeComplaint DisciplineSafety Activity #11005634

ARAMIS INC

TypeComplaint DisciplineSafety Activity #11037736

ARAMIS INC

TypeComplaint DisciplineSafety Activity #11039872

No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.

Oakland, NJ
4 records
MELVILLE, NEW YORK
1 record
OAKLAND, NJ
1 record
NAICS 000000
NAICS 325620

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.