Employer profile — 1973-02-05 to 1976-04-01

DOUGLAS BATTERY MFG

Federal OSHA safety record across 4 records in 2 states.

At a glance

Federal OSHA records for DOUGLAS BATTERY MFG include 0 Severe Injury Reports, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 4 OSHA inspections, spanning 2 states, with incidents dated between 1973-02-05 and 1976-04-01. Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

Watch DOUGLAS BATTERY MFG — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for DOUGLAS BATTERY MFG is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

By source

SIR0 records Injuries0 records Inspections4 records

Severe Injury Reports — 0

No Severe Injury Reports recorded for this employer.

ITA Form 300/301 Injury Reports — 0

No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.

OSHA Inspections — 4

Date range1973-02-05 to 1976-04-01

Most recent 4 of 4 inspections for this employer.

Clinton, MS — 1976-04-01

DOUGLAS BATTERY MFG

TypePlanned DisciplineHealth Activity #13537097

Winston Salem, NC — 1975-10-10

DOUGLAS BATTERY MFG

TypeFollow-up DisciplineSafety Activity #14211965

Winston Salem, NC — 1973-03-14

DOUGLAS BATTERY MFG

TypeFollow-up DisciplineHealth Activity #13295597

Winston Salem, NC — 1973-02-05

DOUGLAS BATTERY MFG

TypePlanned DisciplineHealth Activity #13295555

Recent OSHA citations

No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.

Company facts

Name as filed with OSHA: DOUGLAS BATTERY MFG
States with records: MS, NC

Addresses on OSHA filings

3 records: 500 BATTERY DRIVE, WINSTON SALEM, NC 27107
1 record: CLINTON INDUSTRIAL PARK, CLINTON, MS 39050

Locations on record

Winston Salem, NC: 3 records
Clinton, MS: 1 record

Industries (NAICS codes seen)

Sources

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.