105,313Records 71,083Employers 85,290Hospitalizations 27,770Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-10-31
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

Elite Comfort Solutions

Federal OSHA safety record across 7 records in 3 states.

Federal OSHA records for Elite Comfort Solutions include 1 Severe Injury Report, 6 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 0 OSHA inspections, spanning 3 states, with incidents dated between and . Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

Compliance History Report Elite Comfort Solutions's full severe-injury history, benchmarked against its sector and the national average — one portable, citable document.
Get the report →
Ongoing Severe-Injury Monitor A private watch page for Elite Comfort Solutions, refreshed daily as new federal OSHA severe injuries are published — with full history and benchmark. $99/mo, cancel anytime.
Start monitoring →

SIR1 record Injuries6 records Inspections0 records

Date range

Most recent 1 of 1 reports for this employer.

Elite Comfort Solutions

EventCaught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaning

Hospitalized Amputation

Date range to

Most recent 6 of 6 filings for this employer.

No OSHA inspections recorded for this employer.

No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.

Name as filed with OSHA
Elite Comfort Solutions
States with records
MD, MS
4 records
212 CDF BLVD, VERONA, MS 38879
2 records
1900 CLARK RD, HAVRE DE GRACE, MD 21078
1 record
1921 S GREEN STREET, TUPELO, MISSISSIPPI 38802
VERONA, MS
4 records
Havre de Grace, MD
2 records
TUPELO, MS
1 record
NAICS 326150
Polyurethane foam products manufacturing
NAICS 337910

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.