105,313Records 71,083Employers 85,290Hospitalizations 27,770Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-10-31
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

Employer profile — to

ELLIS CONSTRUCTION CO INC

Federal OSHA safety record across 6 records in 2 states.

At a glance

Federal OSHA records for ELLIS CONSTRUCTION CO INC include 0 Severe Injury Reports, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 6 OSHA inspections, spanning 2 states, with incidents dated between and . Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

By source

SIR0 records Injuries0 records Inspections6 records

Severe Injury Reports — 0

No Severe Injury Reports recorded for this employer.

ITA Form 300/301 Injury Reports — 0

No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.

OSHA Inspections — 6

Date range to

Most recent 7 of 6 inspections for this employer.

Recent OSHA citations

No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.

Company facts

Name as filed with OSHA
ELLIS CONSTRUCTION CO INC
Also appears in filings as
ELLIS CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. · ELLIS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
States with records
FL, SC

Addresses on OSHA filings

1 record
1807 EAST BUFFALO, TAMPA, FL 33604
1 record
445 S MISSOURI AVE, LAKELAND, FL 33801
1 record
525 FENTRESS BLVD, DAYTONA BEACH, FL 32020
1 record
62 ALLEN STREET, JAMESTOWN, NY 14701
1 record
6311 S LOIS AVE, TAMPA, FL 33601
1 record
6820 TAMIAMI TRAIL, RUSKIN, FL 33570
1 record
REVCO DRIVE, N. AUGUSTA, SC 29841

Locations on record

Tampa, FL
2 records
Daytona Beach, FL
1 record
Lakeland, FL
1 record
N. AUGUSTA, SC
1 record
Ruskin, FL
1 record

Industries (NAICS codes seen)

Sources

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.