Employer profile — 1978-12-12 to 1982-02-24

EPOLUX MFG CORP

Federal OSHA safety record across 3 records in NY.

At a glance

Federal OSHA records for EPOLUX MFG CORP include 0 Severe Injury Reports, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 3 OSHA inspections, spanning NY, with incidents dated between 1978-12-12 and 1982-02-24. Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

Watch EPOLUX MFG CORP — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for EPOLUX MFG CORP is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

By source

SIR0 records Injuries0 records Inspections3 records

Severe Injury Reports — 0

No Severe Injury Reports recorded for this employer.

ITA Form 300/301 Injury Reports — 0

No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.

OSHA Inspections — 3

Date range1978-12-12 to 1982-02-24

Most recent 3 of 3 inspections for this employer.

New York -Richmond, NY — 1982-02-24

EPOLUX MFG CORP

TypePlanned DisciplineSafety Activity #11907680

New York -Richmond, NY — 1979-01-18

EPOLUX MFG CORP

TypeFollow-up DisciplineSafety Activity #11849635

New York -Richmond, NY — 1978-12-12

EPOLUX MFG CORP

TypeComplaint DisciplineSafety Activity #11837853

Recent OSHA citations

No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.

Company facts

Name as filed with OSHA: EPOLUX MFG CORP
States with records: NY

Addresses on OSHA filings

2 records: 18-54 42 STREET, NEW YORK -RICHMOND, NY 11105
1 record: 18-54 42ND ST, NEW YORK -RICHMOND, NY 11105

Locations on record

New York -Richmond, NY: 3 records

Industries (NAICS codes seen)

Sources

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.