105,313Records 71,083Employers 85,290Hospitalizations 27,770Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-10-31
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

Employer profile — to

Express Fashion Operations, LLC

Federal OSHA safety record across 1 record in CONNECTICUT.

At a glance

Federal OSHA records for Express Fashion Operations, LLC include 1 Severe Injury Report, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 0 OSHA inspections, spanning CONNECTICUT, with incidents dated between and . Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

Compliance History Report Express Fashion Operations, LLC's full severe-injury history, benchmarked against its sector and the national average — one portable, citable document.
Get the report →
Ongoing Severe-Injury Monitor A private watch page for Express Fashion Operations, LLC, refreshed daily as new federal OSHA severe injuries are published — with full history and benchmark. $99/mo, cancel anytime.
Start monitoring →

By source

SIR1 record Injuries0 records Inspections0 records

Severe Injury Reports — 1

Date range

Most recent 1 of 1 reports for this employer.

ITA Form 300/301 Injury Reports — 0

No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.

OSHA Inspections — 0

No OSHA inspections recorded for this employer.

Recent OSHA citations

No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.

Company facts

Name as filed with OSHA
Express Fashion Operations, LLC
States with records
CT

Addresses on OSHA filings

1 record
90 ELM STREET, ENFIELD, CONNECTICUT 06082

Locations on record

ENFIELD, CT
1 record

Industries (NAICS codes seen)

NAICS 448120
—

Sources

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.