105,313Records 71,083Employers 85,290Hospitalizations 27,770Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-10-31
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

Employer profile — to

GENERAL PRINTING INK DIV

Federal OSHA safety record across 5 records in 2 states.

At a glance

Federal OSHA records for GENERAL PRINTING INK DIV include 0 Severe Injury Reports, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 5 OSHA inspections, spanning 2 states, with incidents dated between and . Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

By source

SIR0 records Injuries0 records Inspections5 records

Severe Injury Reports — 0

No Severe Injury Reports recorded for this employer.

ITA Form 300/301 Injury Reports — 0

No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.

OSHA Inspections — 5

Date range to

Most recent 11 of 5 inspections for this employer.

Recent OSHA citations

No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.

Company facts

Name as filed with OSHA
GENERAL PRINTING INK DIV
States with records
NJ, TN

Addresses on OSHA filings

2 records
390 CENTRAL AVENUE, EAST RUTHERFORD, NJ 07073
2 records
4041 RUNWAY RD., MEMPHIS, TN 38118
1 record
3115 LONG LAKE RD, ST PAUL, MN 55113
1 record
3301 HUNTING PARK AVE, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19132
1 record
3301 HUNTING PARK AVENUE, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19132
1 record
450 MILWAUKEE ST, MENASHA, WI 54952
1 record
450 MILWAUKEE STREET, MENASHA, WI 54952
1 record
CENTRAL AVE, EAST RUTHERFORD, NJ 07073
1 record
W156 N9251 TIPP ST, MENOMONEE FALLS, WI 53051

Locations on record

East Rutherford, NJ
3 records
MEMPHIS, TN
2 records

Industries (NAICS codes seen)

Sources

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.