105,313Records 71,083Employers 85,290Hospitalizations 27,770Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-10-31
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

Gm Contracting Inc

Federal OSHA safety record across 2 records in CA.

Federal OSHA records for Gm Contracting Inc include 0 Severe Injury Reports, 2 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 0 OSHA inspections, spanning CA, with incidents dated between and . Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

SIR0 records Injuries2 records Inspections0 records Citations5

No Severe Injury Reports recorded for this employer.

Date range to

Most recent 2 of 2 filings for this employer.

Most recent 2 of 0 inspections for this employer.

GM CONTRACTING INC.

TypeAccident-driven DisciplineHealth Activity #348505348

Most recent 5 citations issued under any inspection of this employer. Each row links back to the parent inspection.

3457(C)(3)(B)

TypeOther-than-serious Penalty$375.00 View inspection →

Other-than-serious

3457(C)(3)(A)

TypeOther-than-serious Penalty$700.00 View inspection →

Other-than-serious

3457(C)(3)(C)

TypeOther-than-serious Penalty$375.00 View inspection →

Other-than-serious

3395(D)(1)

TypeSerious Penalty$8435.00 View inspection →

Serious

3395(H)(1)

TypeSerious Penalty$8435.00 View inspection →

Serious
Name as filed with OSHA
Gm Contracting Inc
Also appears in filings as
GM CONTRACTING INC. · GM CONTRACTING, INC.
States with records
CA
2 records
1013 MAIN ST, DELANO, CA 93215
1 record
36?12'52.6"N 119?17'21.9"W, TULARE, CA 93274
1 record
NW CORNER OF ROAD 126 AND AVE 240, TULARE, CA 93274
Delano, CA
2 records
NAICS 115115
Farm labor contractors

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.