105,313Records 71,083Employers 85,290Hospitalizations 27,770Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-10-31
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

Employer profile — to

J.T. Thorpe & Son, Inc.

Federal OSHA safety record across 5 records in 3 states.

At a glance

Federal OSHA records for J.T. Thorpe & Son, Inc. include 2 Severe Injury Reports, 2 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 1 OSHA inspection, spanning 3 states, with incidents dated between and . Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

Compliance History Report J.T. Thorpe & Son, Inc.'s full severe-injury history, benchmarked against its sector and the national average — one portable, citable document.
Get the report →
Ongoing Severe-Injury Monitor A private watch page for J.T. Thorpe & Son, Inc., refreshed daily as new federal OSHA severe injuries are published — with full history and benchmark. $99/mo, cancel anytime.
Start monitoring →

By source

SIR2 records Injuries2 records Inspections1 record

Severe Injury Reports — 2

Date range to

Most recent 2 of 2 reports for this employer.

GEISMAR, LOUISIANA —

J.T. Thorpe & Son, Inc

EventStruck by discharged object or substance

Hospitalized

BAYTOWN, TEXAS —

J.T. Thorpe & Son Inc

EventStruck against stationary object or equipment, n.e.c.

Hospitalized

ITA Form 300/301 Injury Reports — 2

Date range to

Most recent 2 of 2 filings for this employer.

OSHA Inspections — 1

Date range

Most recent 1 of 1 inspections for this employer.

Recent OSHA citations

No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.

Locations on record

Richmond, CA
2 records
CHINESE CAMP, CA
1 record
GEISMAR, LOUISIANA
1 record
BAYTOWN, TEXAS
1 record

Industries (NAICS codes seen)

NAICS 000000
—
NAICS 238140
Masonry contractors
NAICS 562991
—

Sources

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.