Employer profile — 1973-05-02 to 1974-02-27

JULIUS NASSO CONCRETE CORP

Federal OSHA safety record across 6 records in NY.

At a glance

Federal OSHA records for JULIUS NASSO CONCRETE CORP include 0 Severe Injury Reports, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 6 OSHA inspections, spanning NY, with incidents dated between 1973-05-02 and 1974-02-27. Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

Watch JULIUS NASSO CONCRETE CORP — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JULIUS NASSO CONCRETE CORP is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

By source

SIR0 records Injuries0 records Inspections6 records

Severe Injury Reports — 0

No Severe Injury Reports recorded for this employer.

ITA Form 300/301 Injury Reports — 0

No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.

OSHA Inspections — 6

Date range1973-05-02 to 1974-02-27

Most recent 6 of 6 inspections for this employer.

New York -Richmond, NY — 1974-02-27

No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.

Company facts

Name as filed with OSHA: JULIUS NASSO CONCRETE CORP
States with records: NY

Addresses on OSHA filings

2 records: 108 ST AND 62 DRIVE, NY 11375
1 record: 375 PEARL ST, NEW YORK -RICHMOND, NY 10038
1 record: HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER, MELVILLE, NY 11746
1 record: HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER BUILDIN, STONY BROOK, NY 11790
1 record: TELEPHONE BLDG 375 PEARL ST, NEW YORK -RICHMOND, NY 10038

Locations on record

NY: 2 records
New York -Richmond, NY: 2 records
Melville, NY: 1 record
Stony Brook, NY: 1 record

Industries (NAICS codes seen)

Sources

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.