105,313Records 71,083Employers 85,290Hospitalizations 27,770Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-10-31
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION

Federal OSHA safety record across 2 records in 2 states.

Federal OSHA records for NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION include 1 Severe Injury Report, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 1 OSHA inspection, spanning 2 states, with incidents dated between and . Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

Compliance History Report NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION's full severe-injury history, benchmarked against its sector and the national average — one portable, citable document.
Get the report →
Ongoing Severe-Injury Monitor A private watch page for NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, refreshed daily as new federal OSHA severe injuries are published — with full history and benchmark. $99/mo, cancel anytime.
Start monitoring →

SIR1 record Injuries0 records Inspections1 record

Date range

Most recent 1 of 1 reports for this employer.

No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.

Date range

Most recent 8 of 1 inspections for this employer.

No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.

Name as filed with OSHA
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
States with records
GA
2 records
1234 SIXTH AVENUE, COLUMBUS, GA 31993
2 records
34 SCRUGGS ST., CHATTANOOGA, TN 37403
1 record
125 SPRING STREET SW, ATLANTA, GA 30303
1 record
1500 CARSON ST., RALEIGH, NC 27608
1 record
2040 E. 106TH ST., CHICAGO, IL 60617
1 record
650 W PEACHTREE STREET NW, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30308
1 record
952 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, MACON, GA 31201
ATLANTA, GA
2 records
NAICS 482111

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.