Employer profile — 1983-03-15 to 1983-08-03

SEIDEL CHEVROLET INC

Federal OSHA safety record across 3 records in MD.

At a glance

Federal OSHA records for SEIDEL CHEVROLET INC include 0 Severe Injury Reports, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 3 OSHA inspections, spanning MD, with incidents dated between 1983-03-15 and 1983-08-03. Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

Watch SEIDEL CHEVROLET INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for SEIDEL CHEVROLET INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

By source

SIR0 records Injuries0 records Inspections3 records

Severe Injury Reports — 0

No Severe Injury Reports recorded for this employer.

ITA Form 300/301 Injury Reports — 0

No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.

OSHA Inspections — 3

Date range1983-03-15 to 1983-08-03

Most recent 3 of 3 inspections for this employer.

Landover, MD — 1983-08-03

SEIDEL CHEVROLET INC

TypeFollow-up DisciplineHealth Activity #12506903

Landover, MD — 1983-04-13

SEIDEL CHEVROLET INC

TypePlanned DisciplineHealth Activity #12507208

Landover, MD — 1983-03-15

SEIDEL CHEVROLET INC

TypeComplaint DisciplineSafety Activity #12494712

Recent OSHA citations

No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.

Company facts

Name as filed with OSHA: SEIDEL CHEVROLET INC
States with records: MD

Addresses on OSHA filings

2 records: 7610 CENTRAL AVE, LANDOVER, MD 20786
1 record: 7610 CENTRAL AVENUE, LANDOVER, MD 20786

Locations on record

Landover, MD: 3 records

Industries (NAICS codes seen)

Sources

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.