105,313Records 71,083Employers 85,290Hospitalizations 27,770Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-10-31
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

Employer profile — to

TWEET GAROT MECHANICAL INC

Federal OSHA safety record across 8 records in 2 states.

At a glance

Federal OSHA records for TWEET GAROT MECHANICAL INC include 1 Severe Injury Report, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 7 OSHA inspections, spanning 2 states, with incidents dated between and . Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

Compliance History Report TWEET GAROT MECHANICAL INC's full severe-injury history, benchmarked against its sector and the national average — one portable, citable document.
Get the report →
Ongoing Severe-Injury Monitor A private watch page for TWEET GAROT MECHANICAL INC, refreshed daily as new federal OSHA severe injuries are published — with full history and benchmark. $99/mo, cancel anytime.
Start monitoring →

By source

SIR1 record Injuries0 records Inspections7 records

Severe Injury Reports — 1

Date range

Most recent 1 of 1 reports for this employer.

ITA Form 300/301 Injury Reports — 0

No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.

OSHA Inspections — 7

Date range to

Most recent 16 of 7 inspections for this employer.

Recent OSHA citations

No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.

Locations on record

MANITOWOC, WI
3 records
APPLETON, WI
1 record
DE PERE, WI
1 record
FONDDU LAC, WI
1 record
GREEN BAY, WI
1 record
RHINELANDER, WISCONSIN
1 record

Industries (NAICS codes seen)

NAICS 000000
—
NAICS 238220
—

Sources

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.