Employer profile — 1983-04-28 to 1988-04-26

WHITE FOX CONSTRUCTION CO

Federal OSHA safety record across 4 records in NC.

At a glance

Federal OSHA records for WHITE FOX CONSTRUCTION CO include 0 Severe Injury Reports, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 4 OSHA inspections, spanning NC, with incidents dated between 1983-04-28 and 1988-04-26. Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

Watch WHITE FOX CONSTRUCTION CO — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for WHITE FOX CONSTRUCTION CO is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

By source

SIR0 records Injuries0 records Inspections4 records

Severe Injury Reports — 0

No Severe Injury Reports recorded for this employer.

ITA Form 300/301 Injury Reports — 0

No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.

OSHA Inspections — 4

Date range1983-04-28 to 1988-04-26

Most recent 5 of 4 inspections for this employer.

TAYLORSVILLE, NC — 1992-04-09

No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.

Company facts

Name as filed with OSHA: WHITE FOX CONSTRUCTION CO
Also appears in filings as: WHITE FOX CONSTRUCTION CO.
States with records: NC

Addresses on OSHA filings

1 record: 1214 MONROE RD, STATESVILLE, NC 28677
1 record: CENTRAL CARE FACILITIES, BURLINGTON, NC 27215
1 record: HIGHWAY 127 SOUTH, TAYLORSVILLE, NC 28681
1 record: HWY. 18 WEST, LENOIR, NC 28645
1 record: RIVERBIRCH CORNER SHOPPING CTR, SANFORD, NC 27330

Locations on record

Burlington, NC: 1 record
LENOIR, NC: 1 record
STATESVILLE, NC: 1 record
Sanford, NC: 1 record

Industries (NAICS codes seen)

Sources

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.