Portland, OR —
OSHA Injury Report: Porter W. Yett PDX
Hearing loss · Days away from work
At a glance
On , a hearing loss at Porter W. Yett PDX in 5949 NE Cully Blvd, Portland, OR 97218 resulted in days away from work. Employee was operator in oil field road construction.
Where did this happen?
- Establishment
- Porter W. Yett PDX
- Parent company
- Porter W. Yett
- Street
- 5949 NE Cully Blvd
- City
- Portland
- State
- OR
- ZIP
- 97218
- On-site location
- Crusher belt
What was the outcome?
- Outcome
- Days away from work (code 2)
- Type
- Hearing loss (code 5)
- Days away from work
- 7
Before the incident
using belt drive to move conveyor manually another employee started conveyor
What happened
using belt drive to move conveyor manually another employee started conveyor
Injury or illness
Laceration on right hand thumb
Object or substance involved
belt
Summary line
hand injury
Employee and industry
- Job description
- Operator
- SOC code
- 47-2073 — Operating Engineers and Other Construction Equipment Operators
- NAICS code
- 237310 — Oil field road construction
- NAICS vintage
- 2022
- Avg employees
- 31
- Total hours worked
- 69186
- EIN
- 930517069
- Establishment ID
- 933159
- Employer case #
- 1
When (timing detail)
- Date of incident
- Shift started
- 6:30:00.000
- Time of incident
- 13:30:00.000
- Filing year
- 2023
- Submitted
- 31JAN24:21:50:00
More injuries in this industry (NAICS 237310)
Duluth, MN—
Minnesota Department of Transportation District 1
Minneapolis, MN—
PW-Transportation Operations
Minneapolis, MN—
PW-Transportation Operations
TRUCKEE, CA—
California Department of Transportation Facility 35
LAKEPORT, CA—
California Department of Transportation Facility 535
More injuries in OR
TIGARD, OR—
WM 5935
Portland, OR—
Dynalectric Oregon
Redmond, OR—
Renewal - Redmond
TROUTDALE, OR—
80001021-PORT PORTLAND-G972
PORTLAND, OR—
80001021-NPRS NORTH PORTLAND RSF-G938
Source
Data from OSHA ITA Form 300/301 electronic submissions, filing year 2023. ITA Case Detail records are establishment-reported submissions, not OSHA inspections — no per-record IMIS deep link exists.