2,042,423Injury reports 130,778Establishments Most recent incident 2025-12-31
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

Clayton, NJ —

OSHA Injury Report: On The Mark Logistics LLC

Injury · Days away from work

At a glance

On , an injury at On The Mark Logistics LLC in 20 Beckett Street, Clayton, NJ 08312 resulted in days away from work. Employee was driver in express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation).

Where did this happen?

Establishment
On The Mark Logistics LLC
Parent company
On The Mark Logistics LLC
Street
20 Beckett Street
City
Clayton
State
NJ
ZIP
08312
On-site location
Intersection of SH49 SH50

What was the outcome?

Outcome
Days away from work (code 2)
Type
Injury (code 1)
Days away from work
180

Before the incident

Driving a box truck to her next delivery.

What happened

Driver was involved in a motor vehicle accident which caused the fractured pinky on her right hand.

Injury or illness

Fractured Finger Right little finger

Object or substance involved

Another vehicle that collided with her vehicle.

Summary line

Broken little finger on right hand due to vehicle accident

Employee and industry

Job description
Driver
SOC code
43-5021 — Couriers and Messengers
NAICS code
492110 — Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation)
NAICS vintage
2022
Avg employees
79
Total hours worked
108103
EIN
863563391
Establishment ID
818316
Employer case #
6

When (timing detail)

Date of incident
Shift started
1:30:00.000
Time of incident
5:25:00.000
Submitted
08FEB24:18:02:00

More injuries at On The Mark Logistics LLC

View On The Mark Logistics LLC's full OSHA safety record →

More injuries in this industry (NAICS 492110)

ERLANGER, KY—

CVG RO

More injuries in NJ

SECAUCUS, NJ—

WM 3520

RIVERDALE, NJ—

WM 3443

Source

Data from OSHA ITA Form 300/301 electronic submissions, filing year unspecified. ITA Case Detail records are establishment-reported submissions, not OSHA inspections — no per-record IMIS deep link exists.