2,042,423Injury reports 130,778Establishments Most recent incident 2025-12-31
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

San Francisco, CA —

OSHA Injury Report: Recology San Francisco

Injury · Other recordable case

At a glance

On , an injury at Recology San Francisco in PO Box 881476, San Francisco, CA 94188 resulted in other recordable case. Employee was material Handler in materials Recovery Facilities.

Where did this happen?

Establishment
Recology San Francisco
Parent company
Recology
Street
PO Box 881476
City
San Francisco
State
CA
ZIP
94188
On-site location
Employee states he was in between M53M53 belt lines at the time of the injury

What was the outcome?

Outcome
Other recordable case (code 4)
Type
Injury (code 1)

Before the incident

This claim involves a [REDACTED] material handler states while shoveling glass dirt and heavy debris and while dumping heavy wheelbarrows he hurt both wrists He is righthanded

What happened

EE states while shoveling glass dirt and heavy debris and while dumping heavy wheelbarrows he hurt both wrists He is righthanded Supervisor was notified

Injury or illness

Wrist Right Strain

Object or substance involved

Right Wrist

Summary line

Wrist Right Strain Right Wrist

Employee and industry

Job description
Material Handler
SOC code
53-7062 — Laborers and Freight, Stock, and Material Movers, Hand
NAICS code
562920 — Materials Recovery Facilities
NAICS vintage
2012
Avg employees
104
Total hours worked
209835
EIN
940840895
Establishment ID
404582
Employer case #
RE2630033

When (timing detail)

Date of incident
Shift started
13:00
Time of incident
16:30
Filing year
2025
Submitted
13FEB26:19:24:00

More injuries at Recology San Francisco

View Recology San Francisco's full OSHA safety record →

More injuries in this industry (NAICS 562920)

More injuries in CA

Rancho Cucamonga, CA—

087-RCDC

Source

Data from OSHA ITA Form 300/301 electronic submissions, filing year 2025. ITA Case Detail records are establishment-reported submissions, not OSHA inspections — no per-record IMIS deep link exists.