2,042,423Injury reports 130,778Establishments Most recent incident 2025-12-31
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

WINSTON SALEM, NC —

OSHA Injury Report: WINSTON SALEM NC SDC_1594601

Injury · Days away from work

At a glance

On , an injury at WINSTON SALEM NC SDC_1594601 in 1500 N PATTERSON AVE, WINSTON SALEM, NC 27105 resulted in days away from work. Employee was cITY CARRIER in mail and Parcel Delivery.

Watch Winston Salem NC SDC_1594601 — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Winston Salem NC SDC_1594601 is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

Where did this happen?

Establishment
WINSTON SALEM NC SDC_1594601
Parent company
WINSTON SALEM NC SDC_1594601
Street
1500 N PATTERSON AVE
City
WINSTON SALEM
State
NC
ZIP
27105
On-site location
Customer Property

What was the outcome?

Outcome
Days away from work (code 2)
Type
Injury (code 1)
Days away from work
7

Before the incident

walking on [REDACTED]

What happened

ERGONOMICS - WALKING - Carrier states he was walking to his vehicle after mail delivery at [REDACTED] and twisted his right knee

Injury or illness

Knee-Right- Sprain Strain Twist

Object or substance involved

ergonomics

Summary line

right knee pain

Employee and industry

Job description
CITY CARRIER
SOC code
43-5052 — Postal Service Mail Carriers
NAICS code
491110 — Mail and Parcel Delivery
NAICS vintage
2022
Avg employees
127
Total hours worked
246563
EIN
417600000
Establishment ID
1482604
Employer case #
400463

When (timing detail)

Date of incident
Shift started
8:00
Time of incident
17:40
Filing year
2025
Submitted
20FEB26:12:54:00

More injuries at WINSTON SALEM NC SDC_1594601

View WINSTON SALEM NC SDC_1594601's full OSHA safety record →

More injuries in this industry (NAICS 491110)

More injuries in NC

FAYETTEVILLE, NC—

WM 8218

GREENSBORO, NC—

WM 6402

Source

Data from OSHA ITA Form 300/301 electronic submissions, filing year 2025. ITA Case Detail records are establishment-reported submissions, not OSHA inspections — no per-record IMIS deep link exists.