2,042,423Injury reports 130,778Establishments Most recent incident 2025-12-31
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

Concord, NC —

OSHA Injury Report: Celgard Concord

Injury · Days away from work

At a glance

On , an injury at Celgard Concord in 390 Business Blvd NW, Concord, NC 28027 resulted in days away from work. Employee was manufacturing Technician in acrylic film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing.

Watch Celgard Concord — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Celgard Concord is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

Where did this happen?

Establishment
Celgard Concord
Parent company
Celgard
Street
390 Business Blvd NW
City
Concord
State
NC
ZIP
28027
On-site location
Slitting

What was the outcome?

Outcome
Days away from work (code 2)
Type
Injury (code 1)
Days away from work
3

Before the incident

Picking up dropped J-Knife

What happened

Employee stood up from kneeling and struck head on slitter machine

Injury or illness

Head laceration and concussion

Object or substance involved

Slitter machine

Summary line

Head laceration and concussion from striking head on machine after standing up.

Employee and industry

Job description
Manufacturing Technician
SOC code
17-3026 — Industrial Engineering Technologists and Technicians
NAICS code
326113 — Acrylic film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing
NAICS vintage
2022
Avg employees
271
Total hours worked
546592
EIN
562169137
Establishment ID
1180466
Employer case #
1

When (timing detail)

Date of incident
Shift started
6:00
Time of incident
7:15
Filing year
2025
Submitted
24FEB26:18:30:00

More injuries at Celgard Concord

View Celgard Concord's full OSHA safety record →

More injuries in this industry (NAICS 326113)

More injuries in NC

FAYETTEVILLE, NC—

WM 8218

GREENSBORO, NC—

WM 6402

Source

Data from OSHA ITA Form 300/301 electronic submissions, filing year 2025. ITA Case Detail records are establishment-reported submissions, not OSHA inspections — no per-record IMIS deep link exists.