Waterbury, CT —
OSHA Injury Report: H&T Waterbury, Inc.
Hearing loss · Other recordable case
At a glance
On , a hearing loss at H&T Waterbury, Inc. in 984 Waterville Street, Waterbury, CT 6710 resulted in other recordable case. Employee was operations Assistant in bottle caps and tops, metal, stamping.
Where did this happen?
- Establishment
- H&T Waterbury, Inc.
- Street
- 984 Waterville Street
- City
- Waterbury
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 6710
- On-site location
- Factory floor
What was the outcome?
- Outcome
- Other recordable case (code 4)
- Type
- Hearing loss (code 5)
Before the incident
Working on factory floor
What happened
Hearing loss was discovered during annual testing
Injury or illness
Hearing loss
Object or substance involved
Noise
Summary line
Hearing loss
Employee and industry
- Job description
- Operations Assistant
- SOC code
- 00-9900 — Insufficient Information - NIOSH
- NAICS code
- 332119 — Bottle caps and tops, metal, stamping
- NAICS vintage
- 2012
- Avg employees
- 101
- Total hours worked
- 227829
- EIN
- 060948649
- Establishment ID
- 220197
- Employer case #
- 5
When (timing detail)
- Date of incident
- Shift started
- 5:00
- Filing year
- 2025
- Submitted
- 27FEB26:21:27:00
More injuries at H&T Waterbury, Inc.
Waterbury, CT—
H&T Waterbury, Inc.
Waterbury, CT—
H&T Waterbury, Inc.
Waterbury, CT—
H&T Waterbury, Inc.
Waterbury, CT—
H&T Waterbury, Inc.
Waterbury, CT—
H&T Waterbury, Inc.
View H&T Waterbury, Inc.'s full OSHA safety record →
More injuries in this industry (NAICS 332119)
Minneapolis, MN—
Klesk Metal
Denton, NC—
Plant 1
Wayne, MI—
Unistrut International Corporation - Wayne Operation
Somerset, NJ—
140 Belmont Ave.
Plymouth, MN—
Wrico Stamping of Minnesota
More injuries in CT
DANBURY, CT—
WM 3543
Wallingford, CT—
Masonicare Health Center
NEW BRITAIN, CT—
HOSPITAL OF CENTRAL CT-NB
MIDDLETOWN, CT—
80001021-MIDD MIDDLETOWN-G62
WILLINGTON, CT—
80001021-HART HARTFORD-G61
Source
Data from OSHA ITA Form 300/301 electronic submissions, filing year 2025. ITA Case Detail records are establishment-reported submissions, not OSHA inspections — no per-record IMIS deep link exists.