2,042,423Injury reports 130,778Establishments Most recent incident 2025-12-31
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

Winchester, VA —

OSHA Injury Report: Ward Trucking LLC-Winchester

Injury · Days away from work

At a glance

On , an injury at Ward Trucking LLC-Winchester in 422 Front Royal Pike, Winchester, VA 22603 resulted in days away from work. Employee was lOCAL NONCDL DRIVER in motor freight carrier, general, local.

Where did this happen?

Establishment
Ward Trucking LLC-Winchester
Parent company
Ward Trucking LLC
Street
422 Front Royal Pike
City
Winchester
State
VA
ZIP
22603
On-site location
CUSTOMER LOCATION WARD TRAILER

What was the outcome?

Outcome
Days away from work (code 2)
Type
Injury (code 1)
Days away from work
60

Before the incident

Employee was moving freight

What happened

Employee was moving freight at customer location when his finger got caught between freight and trailer wall.

Injury or illness

Laceration and fracture to right index finger

Object or substance involved

The freight was the cause of direct harm to the employee

Summary line

Laceration and fracture to right index finger

Employee and industry

Job description
LOCAL NONCDL DRIVER
SOC code
53-3032 — Heavy and Tractor-Trailer Truck Drivers
NAICS code
484110 — Motor freight carrier, general, local
NAICS vintage
2022
Avg employees
32
Total hours worked
60495
EIN
760822064
Establishment ID
44807
Employer case #
2711

When (timing detail)

Date of incident
Shift started
8:48:00.000
Time of incident
15:00:00.000
Filing year
2023
Submitted
19FEB24:14:15:00

More injuries at Ward Trucking LLC-Winchester

View Ward Trucking LLC-Winchester's full OSHA safety record →

More injuries in this industry (NAICS 484110)

More injuries in VA

DANVILLE, VA—

WM 4996

COVINGTON, VA—

WM 2662

MADISON HEIGHTS, VA—

WM 2565

FREDERICKSBURG, VA—

WM 1833

Source

Data from OSHA ITA Form 300/301 electronic submissions, filing year 2023. ITA Case Detail records are establishment-reported submissions, not OSHA inspections — no per-record IMIS deep link exists.