Bangor, ME —
OSHA Injury Report: 1855 - Bangor
Injury · Days away from work
At a glance
On , an injury at 1855 - Bangor in 60 Longview Dr, Bangor, ME 044E6 resulted in days away from work. Employee was unknown.
Where did this happen?
- Establishment
- 1855 - Bangor
- Parent company
- Target
- Street
- 60 Longview Dr
- City
- Bangor
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 044E6
- On-site location
- Target Caf Snack Bar
What was the outcome?
- Outcome
- Days away from work (code 2)
- Type
- Injury (code 1)
- Days away from work
- 55
Before the incident
Food-Drink Production
What happened
Slips-Trips-Falls - Back - Lower
Injury or illness
Strain or Tear
Object or substance involved
Own Feet
Summary line
A team member moped the floor in the kitchen part of the cafe No sign was put up [REDACTED] fell on the left side [REDACTED] is [REDACTED] pregnant [REDACTED] was found by TM [REDACTED] on the floor with dishes around her
Employee and industry
- Job description
- Unknown
- SOC code
- 9999 — Uncoded
- NAICS code
- 452112
- NAICS vintage
- 2012
- Avg employees
- 216
- Total hours worked
- 218935
- EIN
- 410215170
- Establishment ID
- 638326
- Employer case #
- ME23760559
When (timing detail)
- Date of incident
- Shift started
- 9:13:00.000
- Time of incident
- 13:30:00.000
- Filing year
- 2023
- Submitted
- 29FEB24:20:35:00
More injuries at 1855 - Bangor
Bangor, ME—
1855 - Bangor
Bangor, ME—
1855 - Bangor
Bangor, ME—
1855 - Bangor
Bangor, ME—
1855 - Bangor
Bangor, ME—
1855 - Bangor
View 1855 - Bangor's full OSHA safety record →
More injuries in this industry (NAICS 452112)
Jurupa Valley, CA—
2916 - Jurupa Valley
Rocklin, CA—
2604 - Rocklin
Sunnyvale, CA—
2584 - Sunnyvale
Hialeah, FL—
2109 - Hialeah
Falls Church, VA—
1893 - Skyline
More injuries in ME
WINDHAM, ME—
WM 2202
SCARBOROUGH, ME—
WM 1788
Bath, ME—
Bath Iron Works
Bath, ME—
Bath Iron Works
Bath, ME—
Bath Iron Works
Source
Data from OSHA ITA Form 300/301 electronic submissions, filing year 2023. ITA Case Detail records are establishment-reported submissions, not OSHA inspections — no per-record IMIS deep link exists.