Waxahachie, TX —
OSHA Injury Report: WIFT LLC
Injury · Days away from work
At a glance
On , an injury at WIFT LLC in PO Box 3243, Waxahachie, TX 75168 resulted in days away from work. Employee was delivery Associate in package delivery.
Where did this happen?
- Establishment
- WIFT LLC
- Parent company
- WIFT LLC
- Street
- PO Box 3243
- City
- Waxahachie
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75168
- On-site location
- Elm St Waxahachie Texas
What was the outcome?
- Outcome
- Days away from work (code 2)
- Type
- Injury (code 1)
- Days away from work
- 46
- Days restricted or transferred
- 37
Before the incident
Employee was lifting a box and reported pain in his back
What happened
Employee was lifting a box and reported pain in his back
Injury or illness
Sprain Back Lower Back
Object or substance involved
heavy package
Summary line
Employee was lifting a box and reported pain in his back
Employee and industry
- Job description
- Delivery Associate
- SOC code
- 43-5021 — Couriers and Messengers
- NAICS code
- 492210 — package delivery
- NAICS vintage
- 2022
- Avg employees
- 169
- Total hours worked
- 153000
- EIN
- 453173650
- Establishment ID
- 1181550
- Employer case #
- 24
When (timing detail)
- Date of incident
- Shift started
- 9:15:00.000
- Time of incident
- 12:46:00.000
- Filing year
- 2023
- Submitted
- 29FEB24:23:23:00
More injuries at WIFT LLC
Waxahachie, TX—
WIFT LLC
Waxahachie, TX—
WIFT LLC
Waxahachie, TX—
WIFT LLC
Waxahachie, TX—
WIFT LLC
Waxahachie, TX—
WIFT LLC
View WIFT LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More injuries in this industry (NAICS 492210)
Shirley, NY—
Leary Logistics
Addison, IL—
Pipers Express Inc.
wyncote, PA—
DJE9 Lyfeline Logistics Management
Waynesboro, VA—
Canyon Trail Logistics inc
South ate, CA—
KAVC-DAX7
More injuries in TX
AMARILLO, TX—
WM 4464
VICTORIA, TX—
WM 4194
FORT WORTH, TX—
WM 3005
ARLINGTON, TX—
WM 2977
SAN ANTONIO, TX—
WM 1803
Source
Data from OSHA ITA Form 300/301 electronic submissions, filing year 2023. ITA Case Detail records are establishment-reported submissions, not OSHA inspections — no per-record IMIS deep link exists.