2,042,423Injury reports 130,778Establishments Most recent incident 2025-12-31
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

Rochester, NY —

OSHA Injury Report: Eastman Kodak Company- Eastman Business Park

Injury · Days away from work

At a glance

On , an injury at Eastman Kodak Company- Eastman Business Park in 1669 Lake Avenue, Rochester, NY 14652 resulted in days away from work. Employee was coating operator in film, sensitized (e.g., camera, motion picture, X-ray), manufacturing.

Where did this happen?

Establishment
Eastman Kodak Company- Eastman Business Park
Parent company
Eastman Kodak Company
Street
1669 Lake Avenue
City
Rochester
State
NY
ZIP
14652
On-site location
Bldng 30 3rd floor chilling room

What was the outcome?

Outcome
Days away from work (code 2)
Type
Injury (code 1)
Days away from work
1

Before the incident

moving pulling a full pallet with electric [REDACTED]

What happened

accidentally pulled the pallet jack up onto right foot ankle

Injury or illness

contusion right foot

Object or substance involved

pallet jack

Summary line

while moving pallet [REDACTED] in improper manner [REDACTED] jumped onto foot

Employee and industry

Job description
coating operator
SOC code
51-9151 — Photographic Process Workers and Processing Machine Operators
NAICS code
325992 — Film, sensitized (e.g., camera, motion picture, X-ray), manufacturing
NAICS vintage
2022
Avg employees
1072
Total hours worked
2374892
EIN
160417150
Establishment ID
1170365
Employer case #
13

When (timing detail)

Date of incident
Shift started
5:42:00.000
Time of incident
9:45:00.000
Submitted
01MAR24:20:58:00

More injuries at Eastman Kodak Company- Eastman Business Park

View Eastman Kodak Company- Eastman Business Park's full OSHA safety record →

More injuries in this industry (NAICS 325992)

More injuries in NY

KINGSTON, NY—

WM 6201

Source

Data from OSHA ITA Form 300/301 electronic submissions, filing year unspecified. ITA Case Detail records are establishment-reported submissions, not OSHA inspections — no per-record IMIS deep link exists.