ALTON, IL —
OSHA Inspection: FIREWORKS PARTNERS INC. DBA MAD BOMBER
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of FIREWORKS PARTNERS INC. DBA MAD BOMBER in MISSISSIPPI RIVER - MILE MARKER 203, ALTON, IL 62002 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 106559685.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FIREWORKS PARTNERS INC. DBA MAD BOMBER
- Site address
- MISSISSIPPI RIVER - MILE MARKER 203
- City
- ALTON
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62002
- Mailing
- 14509 CLARK STREET, CROWN POINT, IN 46307
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 7999
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
15 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3500.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of being burned due to the premature ignition of pyrotechnic shells: At the fireworks barge #D930687, on or about 07-03-97, five employees were exposed to the hazards of being burned due to the premature ignition of three-inch through six-inch pyrotechnic shells. The wooden "ready box" containing these pyrotechnic shells was not equipped with a self-closing lid. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to equip each "ready box" with a self-closing lid as required by NFPA 1123, paragraph 2-2.4.1. DISCLAIMER: a) The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b) The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ***THIS ITEM REQUIRES A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT***
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1000.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of being burned due to the premature ignition of pyrotechnic shells: At the fireworks barge #D930687, on or about 07-03-97, five employees were exposed to the hazards of being burned due to the premature ignition of three-inch, four-inch, and eight-inch pyrotechnic shells. The three-inch and four-inch shells were contained in three cardboard boxes. These boxes were placed along the interior portion of the coaming on the upper port side adjacent to the wooden "ready box" prior to and during the fireworks display. The two cardboard boxes containing the eight-inch shells were placed along the exterior portion of the coaming facing the unguarded prow of the barge. These boxes were adjacent to the three 55- gallon plastic drums containing mortars of comparable size. A defective eight-inch shell landed in-between the "ready box", the three-inch through six-inch mortar batteries, and the cardboard boxes causing a conflaguration in which one employee was burned to death. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to place all pyrotechnic shells into the "ready box" prior to the fireworks display as required by NFPA 1123, paragraph 2- 2.4.2. DISCLAIMER: a) The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b) The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ***THIS ITEM REQUIRES A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT***
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of being burned due to the ignition of pyrotechnic shells: At the fireworks barge #D930687, on or about 07-03-97, five employees were exposed to the hazards of being burned due to the ignition of eight-inch pyrotechnic shells from improperly spaced mortars of comparable size. One employee was using a road flare to manually discharge shells from mortars contained in three plastic 55-gallon drums. Each drum possessed a 22-inch diameter and contained three mortars apiece. Seven eight-inch and two ten-inch mortars were held in the upright position by the three plastic 55-gallon drums. These mortar tubes were not separated from one another by a distance of at least equal to their diameter. The hazard of mortar displacement existed. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to arrange the individual mortar tubes so that they are separated from one another by a distance of at least equal to their diameter as required by NFPA 1123, paragraph 2-3.3.3. DISCLAIMER: a) The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b) The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ***THIS ITEM REQUIRES A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT***
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of being burned due to the ignition of pyrotechnic shells: At the fireworks barge #D930687, on or about 07-03-97, five employees were exposed to the hazards of being burned due to the unexpected detonation of eight-inch pyrotechnic shells from improperly separated mortars of comparable size. One employee was using a road flare to manually discharge shells from mortars contained in three plastic 55-gallon drums. Each drum possessed a 22-inch diameter and contained three mortars apiece. Seven eight- inch mortars and two ten-inch mortars were held in the upright position by the three plastic 55-gallon drums. These mortar tubes were not separated from the drum walls by a minimum of five inches. The hazards of mortar displacement and lack of protection to guard against a premature shell detonation inside the tube existed. One method of abatement to correct these apparent hazards is to arrange the individual mortar tubes so that they are separated from the drum walls by a minimum of five inches as required by NFPA 1123, paragraph 2-3.3.3.2. DISCLAIMER: a) The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b) The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ***THIS ITEM REQUIRES A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT***
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1( of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of being burned due to the premature ignition of pyrotechnic shells. At the fireworks barge #D930687, on or about 07-03-97, five employees were exposed to the hazards of being burned due to the ignition of three-inch through eight-inch pyrotechnic shells due to their lack of knowledge or application of industry-wide safe work practices in the preparation and execution of a fireworks display. The employees were not trained in the applicable portions of the 1995 edition of NFPA 1123, Code for Fireworks Display. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to include these industry-wide safe work practices into already established safety and health programs and then conduct the necessary training until the desired proficiency level has been reached as required by NFPA 1123, paragraph 4-1.3.2. DISCLAIMER: a) The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b) The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ***THIS ITEM REQUIRES A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT***
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of being burned due to the ignition of pyrotechnic shells: At the fireworks barge #D930687, on or about 07-03-97, one employee was exposed to the hazards of being burned due to the ignition of three-inch through six-inch pyrotechnic shells because of his inability to vacate the area due to the initial placement of the "ready box" and three cardboard boxes containing three-inch and four-inch shells approximately four feet away. This employee repeatedly lit the fuses with a road flare, turned, and crouched at the base of each mortar fired. This employee was showered with sparks and burning debris following the mortar's discharge. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to instruct each employee in the proper firing of shells, to ensure that the procedure is followed, and to allow for a sufficient amount of space during the set-up of the fireworks display, as required by NFPA 1123, paragraph 4-2.6. DISCLAIMER: a) The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b) The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ***THIS ITEM REQUIRES A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT***
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.135 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3500.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1000.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.136
- Issued
- Abate by
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $49000.00 · Current $35000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of being burned due to the premature ignition of pyrotechnic shells: At the fireworks barge #D930687, on or about 07-03-97, five employees were exposed to the hazards of being burned due to the premature ignition of three-inch through six-inch pyrotechnic shells. The wooden "ready box" containing these pyrotechnic shells was approximately four feet away initially from mortar batteries of comparable caliber located along the upper starboard side. These mortars were being discharged by an employee through the use of a road flare. A defective eight-inch shell landed in between the "ready box" and the three-inch through six-inch mortar batteries causing a conflaguration in which one employee was burned to death. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to move the "ready box" away from all operational mortar batteries a minimum of 25 feet as required by NFPA 1123, paragraph 2-2.4.3. DISCLAIMER: a) The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b) The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ***THIS ITEM REQUIRES A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT***
Recent events (2)
- — F (U) $35000.00
- — Z (W) $49000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
General-duty citation text
Section 59A)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of being burned due to the ignition of pyrotechnic shells. At the fireworks barge #D930687, on or about 07-03-97, five employees were exposed to the hazards of being burned due to the ignition of three-inch through six-inch pyrotechnic shells without the presence of suitable protection. One employee was using a road flare to manually discharge mortars of comparable caliber along the upper starboard side of the barge. The four other employees were working in the immediate area. A suitable barrier between the shooter, employees, and the mortars was not provided. A barrier did not exist around the individual mortar batteries. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to erect barriers composed of sand bags or other suitable materials between the shooter and the mortars as required by NFPA 1123, paragraph 2-3.4. DISCLAIMER: a) The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b) The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ***THIS ITEM REQUIRES A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT***
Recent events (2)
- — F (U)
- — Z (W)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of being burned due to the ignition of pyrotechnic shells. At the fireworks barge #D930687, on or about 07-03-97, one employee was exposed to the hazards of being burned due to the actual discharge of three-eight-inch pyrotechnic shells with a road flare without using electronic ignition and maintaining a minimum distance of 75 feet. The fireworks display was to include a total of seven eight-inch mortars. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to arrange for any mortar six inches or greater in diameter to be fired off electronically while maintaining a 75 foot minimum distance as required by NFPA 1123, paragraph 4-2.9.2. DISCLAIMER: a) The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b) The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ***THIS ITEM REQUIRES A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT***
Recent events (2)
- — F (U)
- — Z (W)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of being burned due to the ignition of pyrotechnic shells. At the fireworks barge #D930687, on or about 07-03-97, one employee was exposed to the hazards of being burned due to the ignition of four and five-inch pyrotechnic shells without maintaining a minimum distance of 75 feet. This employee was igniting the shells electronically from approximately ten feet away. Suitable barriers were not in use. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to arrange for any mortar to be a minimum of 75 feet away from any employee if it is to be fired off electronically as required by NFPA 1123, paragraph 5-1.3. DISCLAIMER: a) The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b) The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ***THIS ITEM REQUIRES A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT***
Recent events (2)
- — F (U)
- — Z (W)
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $49000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1000.00
- — Z (W) $49000.00
1918.106 C
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $49000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1000.00
- — Z (W) $49000.00
1910.151 B
- Issued
- Abate by
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
SCHENECTADY, NY—2012-01-05 00:00:00
BRUCE D. BOWMAN
BILLINGS, MT—2005-01-25 00:00:00
KGC, INC.
ROCKAWAY, NJ—2002-12-31 00:00:00
ROCKAWAY BOROUGH DPW
FOREST CITY, NC—2002-12-31 00:00:00
HARRY BRICKEY DBA A. BRICKEY CEILING COMPANY
EDGERTON, KS—2002-12-31 00:00:00
SUDDEN BOND INDUSTRIES
More inspections in IL
DEERFIELD, IL—2026-07-16
JOHN BURNS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
BUILDER SERVICES GROUP, INC. DBA CJ INSULATION
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
ROOFING H.P. LLC
HIGHLAND PARK, IL—2026-07-16
UNITED PLUMBING AND DRAIN, INC.
FRANKLIN PARK, IL—2026-07-16
B & M PLASTIC INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 106559685.