OSHA Inspection: STARKIST SAMOA, INC.

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1950.00 · Current $1950.00

General-duty citation text

employee's workplace musculoskeletal risk factors from those listed above.
Designate a
contact person, who has authority to place employees into other
jobs/tasks, to coordinate with
the health care provider the proper job/task placement during the recovery
period of the
employee with a musculoskeletal disorder.
Step 1:Implement an ergonomics program as delineated in items 1 through 4
and 6 through 8
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 as
above.
Step 2:Submit to the Area Director/Director of Enforcement and
Investigations a written
detailed plan of abatement, outlining a schedule for implementation of the
controls
listed in item 5 above.
ALL PROPOSED CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE APPROVED FOR EACH
PARTICULAR USE BY A PERSON TRAINED IN THE EVALUATION OF
WORKPLACE CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE MUSCULOSKELETAL
DISORDERS.  SIXTY (60) DAY PROGRESS REPORTS ARE REQUIRED
amended in 1990:  The
DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD.
Step 3:Implementation of the controls listed in item 5 or other measures
to control the risk
factors as approved by a person trained in the evaluation of workplace
conditions
which cause musculoskeletal disorders.
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was
free from recognized
hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical
harm to employees, in that
employees were required to perform lifting tasks resulting in risk factors
that had caused, were
causing, or were likely to cause musculoskeletal injuries:
(a)In the butchering area, where the large tuna are cut in half, the
evaluation of the manual
lifting tasks of:
FISH LOADING FOR SAWING- The employee stands facing a metal table and
reaches
forward to grasp a 90 to 100 pound fish torso which slides onto the table
from a feed
conveyor (#1).  The fish torso is then lifted and swung to the left where
it is placed onto a
metal chute which feeds onto a second conveyor (#2).  The employee pushes
the fish torso
along the chute onto the second conveyor (#2) which transports the fish
into
the saw
enclosure.
FISH RACKING AFTER SAWING- Employees lift split fish torso's from a metal
table
behind the saw and place them in metal baskets that are sitting in holding
racks.
indicates that employees are exposed to a hazard which is causing or
likely to cause
musculoskeletal injuries.  The employer did not implement an effective
control strategy to
reduce or eliminate such injuries.  The employer's injury and illness
records document
musculoskeletal injuries at lifting tasks.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is
the implementation of an ergonomic management program consisting of the
following
elements:
1.  Employee involvement:  Ensure that employees have an ongoing and
consistent
involvement in all phases of the ergonomic protection process, including
participation in the
identification of problem jobs.
2.  Reporting procedures:  Implement procedures for receiving and
responding to employee
reports of risk factors or musculoskeletal disorders, including
designating someone to receive
reports of risk factor exposures or musculoskeletal disorders who has the
authority to refer the
employees to a health care provider, review the risk factor exposures
reported, and control
the job as necessary.
3.  Employee information:  Provide employees information about
musculoskeletal disorders,
including a description of the risk factors that can cause or aggravate
them; general control
measures that can reduce exposures; a description of signs, symptoms, and
the disorders
themselves; and the reporting procedures.
4.  Identification of problem jobs:  Determine whether any musculoskeletal
disorders have
occurred in the workplace in the past two years by using the OSHA 200
logs, workers'
compensation data, or a musculoskeletal disorders symptoms survey.
Conduct further
evaluation of the jobs where musculoskeletal disorders have occurred in
the past two years to
determine what measures can be designed and implemented to control the
risk factors listed
below.  Complete a records review on an annual basis to determine the
effectiveness of anychanges made to address musculoskeletal disorders.
In addition, review the jobs where exposure occurs, during any one
work-shift, to the
following risk factors for developing musculoskeletal disorders:
-performance of the same motions or motion pattern;
-fixed or awkward work postures (e.g. overhead work, twisted or bent back,
bent wrist,
kneeling, stooping or squatting);
-use of vibrating or impact tools or equipment; and
-piece rate or machine-paced work.
5.  Controlling problem jobs:  Design and implement measures to control
exposure to the risk
factors listed above.
Examples of control measures applicable in this workplace include:
FISH LOADING FOR SAWING- The employee stands facing a metal table and
reaches
forward to grasp a 90 to 100 pound fish torso which slides onto the table
from a feed
conveyor(#1).  The fish torso is then lifted and swung to the left where
it is placed onto a
metal chute which feeds onto a second conveyor(#2).  The employee pushes
the fish torso
along the chute onto the second conveyor(#2) which transports the fish
into the saw enclosure.
KNOWN HAZARD
Employees flex the torso forward extending the arms out in front of the
body to grasp
the 90 to 100 pound fish body.  The fish body is then lifted and the
employee twists
his torso to the left to swing the fish onto the metal chute.  Reaching,
holding the load
away from the body, and twisting the torso to pick up and manipulate the
90 to 100
pound fish creates significant stress and static loading on the
musculoskeletal system
of the shoulder, upper arm, and back as the muscles attempt to counteract
the
downward forces created by the weight of the fish and the upper body.  The
greater
the twist and the further the load is held away from the body the more the
hazard is
increased.  Repetitive lifting while twisting and flexing the torso
increases the
compressive forces on the low back and is consistent with the development
of
shoulder pain, muscle strain, low back pain and disc herniation.
KNOWN CONTROL
1)  Extend the conveyor system combining #1 and #2 together eliminating
the
metal
table and chute.  The fish torso would come out of the previous operation
and proceed
directly into the saw via a conveyor.  The lifting of the fish torso would
be
eliminated.  The employee would only have to rotate the fish torso into
the correct
orientation on the conveyor for the sawing operation.
2)  Extend the conveyor system in such a manner that the fish torso is
deposited
directly onto the metal chute leading into the saw.  The lifting of the
fish would be
eliminated and the employee would only have to rotate the fish torso on
the metal
chute to place it in the correct orientation for the saw.3)  If the
accumulation of fish torso's on the metal chute is a consideration then a
metal stop could be installed on the chute to prevent the fish from
jamming the saw.
The stop could be activated by a foot pedal which will lower if flush with
the metal
chute allowing the employee to push the fish torso onto the saw conveyor.
4)  Provide a hoist or other form of manipulator/lift arm to assist the
employee in
handling the fish torso.  An overhead hoist will eliminate the need for
the employee to
manually lift the fish torso.  The hoist could be installed on an overhead
tracking
system or could be floor mounted and be used as a stationary or portable
unit.  A
grasping system could be specifically developed to accommodate the shape
and size of
the fish torso.
5)  Educate the employees on the basics of body mechanics and the
importance of
maintaining the body in an ergonomically neutral position when performing
repetitive
lifting tasks.  The torso should not be bent forward more than 6 to 10
inches from
vertical and reaches should not exceed 16 to 17 inches forward.  Reaches
out to the
sides of the body should be avoided.  The load should be kept close to the
body and
the feet rotated while turning the entire body rather than just twisting
the
back.
Flexing the torso while performing repetitive lifts should be avoided at
all times.
KNOWN HAZARD
The employee utilizes both hands with a pinch grip utilizing significant
finger force to
pick up a 90 to 100 pound fish torso and place it on the metal chute.
Repeated
utilization of a pinch grip to pick up heavy objects is consistent with
the development
of hand, wrist and forearm pain, tendinitis and carpel tunnel syndrome.
KNOWN CONTROL
1)  Pinch grips should be eliminated and the employee should grip objects
with both
hands in a power grip with the wrists maintained in a neutral position.
One technique
would be to place both hands under the fish torso.  The fish torso would
then be
pulled close to the body at approximately waist level, rotated to the
correct
orientation, and transferred to the desired location on the conveyor.
2)  Educate the employees on the basics of body mechanics and the
importance of
maintaining the body in an ergonomically neutral position when performing
repetitive
lifting tasks.
KNOWN HAZARD
Employees do not wear gloves while manipulating fish torso's.  Fish are
generally
slippery forcing the employee to generate significant hand force to handle
them.
Gloves are available (slime gloves) which have a coarse surface and
indentations
allowing the employee to grasp slippery fish with a minimum of hand force.
Gloves
which fit poorly and/or are made of materials with a low coefficient of
friction require
more force production by the fingers to overcome decreases in friction,
loss of tactile
sensitivity, and increases in resistance created by the material of the
glove.  Whengloves are not used in conjunction with slick fish grip
problems are compounded as
increased hand force must be exerted to maintain control of the fish.
Increases in the
hand force required for a task will significantly increase the chance of
upper extremity
cumulative trauma disorders of the hand and wrist such as wrist, forearm
and hand
pain, tendinitis and carpal tunnel syndrome.
KNOWN CONTROL
1)  If gloves are to be worn they must be of a proper design and fit
properly so they
do not decrease tactile sensitivity.  Gloves should be made of a material
which
increases the coefficient of friction between the hand and the fish.
Correct fit and
materials will reduce the hand and finger force required to perform a
particular
repetitive task.  Several types of gloves are available which have been
developed
specifically for handling slippery fish.  These gloves are currently being
utilized by
the salmon fish processing factory ships.
2)  Educate the employees on the basics of body mechanics and the
importance of
maintaining a neutral wrist when performing repetitive motions.  Where
feasible a
power grip should be utilized in place of a pinch grip.
KNOWN HAZARD
The employee leans over the conveyor to push the fish torso onto the saw
conveyor.
The torso is flexed forward with the arms extended out in front and of the
body.
Flexing the torso while reaching creates significant stress and static
loading on the
musculoskeletal system of the shoulder, upper arm, and back as the muscles
attempt
to counteract the downward forces created by pushing the fish torso and
the weight of
the upper body.  Frequent reaches present a hazard as they tend to force
the torso to
flex forward creating a weak position in terms of arm strength while
supporting the
weight of the arms out away from the body.  This situation slows muscle
recovery,
limits duration of activity, and makes the muscle, tendon, ligament system
more
suspectable to injury.  Studies have shown that fully extending the arm
can lead to
rates of muscle fatigue 2 to 3 times faster than when the arm is held
close to the
body.  Frequent reaches with torso flexion are consistent with the
development of
shoulder irritation and low back pain.
KNOWN CONTROL
1)  Extend the saw conveyor or reposition the employee closer to the saw
conveyor
eliminating reaches.  Instruct him to push the fish torso onto the
conveyor
and then to
let the conveyor bring the fish torso into the saw.  The practice of
reaching out and
pushing the fish along the conveyor should be eliminated.  In general
torso flexion
should be limited to no more than 6 to 10 degrees from vertical.  Maximum
reach
distances of 16 to 17 inches forward are recommended and the arms should
be kept in
front of the body at all times with minimum reaches out to the sides.
Employees
should be trained on the hazards of repetitive torso flexion and reaches.
2)  Educate the employees on the basics of body mechanics and the
importance of
maintaining the body in an ergonomically neutral position when performing
repetitivetasks.
FISH RACKING AFTER SAWING- Employees lift split fish torso's from a metal
table
behind the saw and place them in metal baskets that are sitting in holding
racks.
KNOWN HAZARD
The employee bends over to place the 45 to 55 pound split fish torso into
the lower
three sections of the storage rack.  The torso is flexed forward with the
arms extended
out in front of the body to manipulate the fish torso over the lip of the
metal basket
onto the rack.  Flexing the torso while reaching to manipulate objects
creates
significant stress and static loading on the musculoskeletal system of the
shoulder,
upper arm, and back as the muscles attempt to counteract the downward
forces
created by the weight of the upper body and the fish torso being lifted.
The deeper
the bend the more the hazard is increased.  Repetitive bending of the
torso increases
the compressive forces on the low back and is consistent with the
development of
shoulder pain, muscle strain and low back pain.
KNOWN CONTROL
1)  Utilize a lift table which will minimize the need for employees to
bend and
perform manual material handling tasks below waist level.  Lift tables
usually adjust
in height from approximately one to five feet and this will allow the
employee to lift,
carry and deposit the 45 to 55 pound split fish torso into the rack system
at waist level
eliminating the bending of the back.  There are models which swivel,
minimizing the
need for employees to reach with their arms extended away from their
bodies.  All of
these lift tables minimizes the risk of back, neck and shoulder injuries
by reducing the
need for repetitive bending and forward reaching.
2)  Educate the employees on the basics of body mechanics and the
importance of
maintaining the body in an ergonomically neutral position when performing
repetitive
lifting tasks.  The torso should not be bent forward more than 6 to 10
inches
from
vertical and reaches should not exceed 16 to 17 inches forward.  Reaches
out to the
sides of the body should be avoided.  The load should be kept close to the
body and
the feet rotated while turning the entire body rather than just twisting
the back.
Flexing the torso while performing repetitive lifts should be avoided at
all times.
KNOWN HAZARD
An employee bends over to lift plastic tubs sitting on the floor.  These
tubs are used
to hold scraps from the saw.  The torso is flexed forward with arms
extended in front
and to the sides of the body to pick up the tub from the floor.  Flexing
the torso while
reaching to lift the tub creates significant stress and static loading on
the
musculoskeletal system of the should, upper arm, and back as the muscles
attempt to
counteract the downward forces created by the weight of the upper body and
the fish
being lifted.  Frequent reaches present a hazard as they tend to force the
torso to flex
forward creating a weak position in terms of arm strength while supporting
the weightof the arms out away from the body.  This situation slows muscle
recovery, limits
duration of activity, and makes the muscle, tendon, ligament system more
susceptible
to injury.  Studies have shown that fully extending the arm can lead to
rates of muscle
fatigue 2 to 3 times faster than when the arm is held close to the body.
Frequent
reaches with torso flexion are consistent with the development of shoulder
irritation
and low back pain.
KNOWN CONTROL
1)  Place the plastic holding tubs on stands at waist height on both or
either side of
the saw table eliminating the need for an employee to bend and pick the
tub sitting on
the floor.  All lifts could then be performed at waist level which is the
optimum lifting
height.  These stands could have wheels allowing them to be moved easily
throughout
the workplace eliminating carries.
2)  Where lifts of tubs filled with fish scraps must be performed educate
the employee
on proper lifting techniques and limit the size of the holding tubs so
that the weight
lifted does not violate the NIOSH Lifting Guide.
3)  Educate the employees on the basics of body mechanics and the
importance of
maintaining the body in an ergonomically neutral position when performing
repetitive
lifting tasks.  The torso should not be bent forward more than 6 to 10
inches from
vertical and reaches should not exceed 16 to 17 inches forward.  Reaches
out to the
sides of the body should be avoided.  The load should be kept close to the
body and
the feet rotated while turning the entire body rather than just twisting
the
back.
Flexing the torso while performing repetitive lifts should be avoided at
all times.
KNOWN HAZARD
Employees do not wear gloves while manipulating fish torso's.  Fish are
generally
slippery forcing the employee to generate significant hand force to handle
them.
Gloves are available (slime gloves) which have a coarse surface and
indentations
allowing the employee to grasp slippery fish with a minimum of hand force.
Gloves
which fit poorly and/or are made of materials with a low coefficient of
friction require
more force production by the fingers to overcome decreases in friction,
loss of tactile
sensitivity, and increases in resistance created by the material of the
glove.  When
gloves are not used in conjunction with slick fish grip problems are
compounded as
increased hand force must be exerted to maintain control of the fish.
Increases in the
hand force required for a task will significantly increase the chance of
upper extremity
cumulative trauma disorders of the hand and wrist such as wrist, forearm
and hand
pain, tendinitis and carpal tunnel syndrome.
KNOWN CONTROL
1)  If gloves are to be worn they must be of a proper design and fit
properly so that
they do not decrease tactile sensitivity.  Gloves should be made of a
material which
increases the coefficient of friction between the hand and the fish.
Correct fit and
materials will reduce the hand and finger force required to perform a
particular
repetitive task.  Several types of gloves are available which have been
developedspecifically for handling slippery fish.  These gloves are
currently being utilized by
the salmon fish processing factory ships.
2)  Educate the employees on the basics of body mechanics and the
importance of
maintaining a neutral wrist when performing repetitive motions.  Where
feasible a
power grip should be utilized in place of a pinch grip.
6.  Ergonomic design for new or changed jobs:  Consider ergonomic design
principles when
changing or introducing jobs by using suppliers and designers to ensure
the risk factors listed
above are eliminated.
7.  Employee training:  Train employees to know how to identify
musculoskeletal risk factors,
how to control those risk factors, and how to use risk factor control
measures properly.
8.  Medical management:  Promptly refer employees reporting
musculoskeletal disorders to a
health care provider who is knowledgeable in the assessment and treatment
of work-related
musculoskeletal disorders.  Provide the health care provider with
information on the

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1390.00 · Current $1390.00

General-duty citation text

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 as
amended in 1990:  The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was
free from recognized
hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical
harm to employees, in that
employees were required to use fish racks with broken, protruding parts
and bent basket supports and
fish rack baskets with broken protruding wires that had caused, were
causing, or were likely to cause
puncture wounds and cuts requiring doctor's treatment:
In the butchering, main packing and mini packing areas of the cannery, an
evaluation of 168
fish racks and their associated fish baskets found 63 racks with broken,
protruding metal
parts, 53 racks with bent basket supports, and 105 fish baskets with
broken, protruding wires,
exposing employees handling the racks and baskets to the hazard of
striking against the
broken, protruding fish rack and basket parts; and the employees working
near the racks to
the hazard to being struck by fish baskets that fall off the fish racks.
The employer did not
implement an effective fish rack and fish basket maintenance strategy to
reduce or eliminate
such injuries.  The employer's injury and illness records document
puncture wounds and cuts
requiring doctors' treatment at the fish rack and fish basket tasks.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is
the implementation of an effective fish rack and fish basket maintenance
program consisting of
the following elements:
1.  Fish racks and fish baskets with defects, such as, broken, protruding
metal parts, bent fish
basket supports, or other defective components, shall either be
immediately
marked in a
manner that readily identifies them as defective, or be tagged with "Do
Not Use" or similar
language, and shall be withdrawn from service until repaired.
2.  Fish rack and fish basket repairs shall restore the racks and baskets
to a condition meeting
at least the original design criteria, before the racks or baskets are
returned to service.
3.  The employer shall ensure that defective fish racks and fish baskets
are tagged and
withdrawn from service until repaired to a condition meeting at least the
original design
criteria.
Step 1:Develop a plan to implement a fish rack and fish basket maintenance
program as
delineated in items 1 through 3 above or other equally effective abatement
methods.
Step 2:Submit to the Area Director/Director of Enforcement and
Investigation a written
detailed plan of abatement, outlining a schedule for implementation of the
maintenance
program as detailed above or other equally effective abatement methods.
Step 3:Implementation of the maintenance program detailed above or other
equally effective
abatement methods.

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3900.00 · Current $3900.00

General-duty citation text

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Actor of 1970 as
%%
amended in 1990:  The employer
did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from
recognized hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in
that equipment failures on the
ammonia refrigeration system had caused, were causing, or were likely to
cause exposures to ammonia
requiring doctor's treatment.
(a)In the cannery, an ammonia refrigeration elbow failure and a valve
failure resulted in over 100
employees receiving emergency room treatment.  The employer did not
implement an effective
program to maintain the mechanical integrity of the ammonia refrigeration
equipment.  The
employer's injury and illness records document ammonia exposures which
required doctor's
treatment.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is the
implementation of an effective ammonia refrigeration mechanical integrity
maintenance program
consisting of the following elements:
1.  Establishing and implementing written procedures to maintain the
integrity of the ammonia
refrigeration equipment.
2.  Training maintenance employees in an overview of the ammonia
refrigeration system, its
hazards, and applicable maintenance procedures to assure maintenance
employees can perform
their jobs in a safe manner.
3.  Inspecting and testing the ammonia refrigeration equipment.  The
inspections and tests shall
follow good and recognized engineering practices.  The frequency of the
inspections
and tests
shall be consistent with applicable manufacturers' recommendations, good
engineering practices,
and more frequently if determined necessary by prior operating experience.
4.  Documenting inspections and tests.  The documentation shall identify
the date of the
inspection or test, the name of the person who performed the inspection or
test, the serial number
or other identifier of the equipment on which the inspection or test was
performed, a description
of the inspection or test performed , the results of the inspection or
test.
5.  Correcting deficient equipment.  Deficiencies in equipment that are
outside acceptable limits
(defined by the manufacturer or good engineering practices) shall be
corrected before further use.
6.  Ensuring new equipment is suitable.  Equipment as it is fabricated
shall be suitable for the
ammonia refrigeration system.  Checks and inspections shall be performed
to assure equipment
is installed properly and consistent with design specifications and
manufacturers' instructions.
Maintenance materials, spare parts and equipment shall be suitable for the
ammonia refrigeration
system.
Step 1:Develop a plan to implement a ammonia refrigeration mechanical
integrity maintenance program
as delineated in items 1 through 6 above or other equally effective
abatement methods.
Step 2:Submit to the Area Director/Director of Enforcement and
Investigation a written detailed plan
of abatement, outlining a schedule for implementation of the maintenance
program as detailed
above or other equally effective abatement methods.
Step 3:Implementation of the maintenance program detailed above or other
equally effective abatement
methods.

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1950.00 · Current $1950.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2785.00 · Current $2785.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $835.00 · Current $835.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1950.00 · Current $1950.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1950.00 · Current $1950.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1390.00 · Current $1390.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1110.00 · Current $1110.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1950.00 · Current $1950.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1950.00 · Current $1950.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1390.00 · Current $1390.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1390.00 · Current $1390.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1390.00 · Current $1390.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1390.00 · Current $1390.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1390.00 · Current $1390.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1950.00 · Current $1950.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1110.00 · Current $1110.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3900.00 · Current $3900.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3900.00 · Current $3900.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3900.00 · Current $3900.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3900.00 · Current $3900.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $835.00 · Current $835.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3900.00 · Current $3900.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3900.00 · Current $3900.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1390.00 · Current $1390.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1950.00 · Current $1950.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1950.00 · Current $1950.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1996-03-31 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $13930.00 · Current $13930.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $13930.00 · Current $13930.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $39000.00 · Current $39000.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $39000.00 · Current $39000.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $39000.00 · Current $39000.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $39000.00 · Current $39000.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $39000.00 · Current $39000.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $39000.00 · Current $39000.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $39000.00 · Current $39000.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $39000.00 · Current $39000.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $38000.00 · Current $38000.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $39000.00 · Current $39000.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $39000.00 · Current $39000.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $39000.00 · Current $39000.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $39000.00 · Current $39000.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $39000.00 · Current $39000.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $39000.00 · Current $39000.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $39000.00 · Current $39000.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $39000.00 · Current $39000.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $39000.00 · Current $39000.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $39000.00 · Current $39000.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $39000.00 · Current $39000.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $39000.00 · Current $39000.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $39000.00 · Current $39000.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $40000.00 · Current $40000.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $30650.00 · Current $30650.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $22280.00 · Current $22280.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3340.00 · Current $3340.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1110.00 · Current $1110.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $19500.00 · Current $19500.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $9750.00 · Current $9750.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $9750.00 · Current $9750.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $9750.00 · Current $9750.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $9750.00 · Current $9750.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $9750.00 · Current $9750.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $5570.00 · Current $5570.00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Issued

1994-12-13 00:00:00

Abate by

1995-01-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4115.00 · Current $4115.00