BATON ROUGE, LA —
OSHA Inspection: LOUISIANA CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LOUISIANA CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC in 16255 OLD PERKINS RD, BATON ROUGE, LA 70810 (NAICS 327390). OSHA activity number 305960288.
Watch Louisiana Concrete Products INC — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Louisiana Concrete Products INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LOUISIANA CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC
- Site address
- 16255 OLD PERKINS RD
- City
- BATON ROUGE
- State
- LA
- ZIP
- 70810
- Mailing
- PO BOX 83960, BATON ROUGE, LA 70884
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327390
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3272
- Employees
- 95
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
45 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the recognized hazard of being struck by falling portions of the hoisted load(s) on the following overhead hoists: a) The manual overhead hoist of unknown capacity and manufacture located in the welding shop and another located at the west end of the road barrier manufacturing area did not have a latches on their load hooks, the overhead structures on which the hoists were mounted had not been load rated by the employer to determine the load capacity, the hoists were not labeled as to rating, manufacturer or operating warnings/guidelines and the hoists had not been inspected daily to ensure all safety devices were functioning appropriately. The hoists were utilized by employees to lift tools and materials and these deficiencies did potentially expose them to the hazards of an overloaded hoist and/or a dropped load. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to provide an undamaged load hook - with a latch, in accordance with Paragraph 16-1.1.2.4(d) of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) B30.16- 1973, Overhead Hoists. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to determine the load rating capacity of the overhead structure on which the hoist is mounted, in accordance with Paragraph 16-1.1.3.1 of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) B30.16-1973, Overhead Hoists. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to perform frequent inspections (daily) of all safety devices to determine malfunctions, in accordance with Paragraph 16-1.2.1.1(b)(1) of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) B30.16-1973, Overhead Hoists. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to maintain the rating of the hoist permanently on the hoist or load block, in accordance with Paragraph 16-1.1.1.1 of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) B30.16-1973, Overhead Hoists. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to maintain the manufacturer's name, address, and unit identification of the hoist permanently, in accordance with Paragraph 16-1.1.1.2 of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) B30.16-1973, Overhead Hoists. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to maintain the WARNING legend and cautionary operating language on the hoist, in accordance with Paragraph 16-1.1.1.3 of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) B30.16-1973, Overhead Hoists. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to determine the load rating capacity of the overhead structure on which the hoist is mounted, in accordance with Paragraph 16-2.1.3.6 of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) B30.16-1973, Overhead Hoists. DISCLAIMERS: 1. You are not limited to the abatement methods suggested above. 2. The methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. 3. The employer is responsible for selecting and carrying out an appropriate method.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of being struck by unsecured air hose connections. a) Employees were observed using two air hoses that were not secured together with retainer clips or lanyards. These hoses were used to provide air that was being used to clean the concrete forms in the casting shed. Employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method for abatement is to properly secure the hose couplings with safety clips, retainers or other positive means to prevent the couplings from becoming disconnected in accordance with manufacturer recommendations. DISCLAIMERS: 1. You are not limited to the abatement methods suggested above. 2. The methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. 3. The employer is responsible for selecting and carrying out an appropriate method of abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $438 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of overloading of a hydraulic boom crane or to the hazards of a dropped load due to the lack of a load rating chart: a) Employees were observed operating the Dressor Hydraulic Boom Crane and there was not a load rating chart available in the cab of the crane. This did expose employees to the hazards of overloading the crane and dropped loads. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to ensure that there is a load rating chart with clearly legible and figures securely fixed to the crane cab and easily visible to the operator when seated at the controls in accordance with Section 15-1.1.3 of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) B30.15-1973, Mobile Hydraulic Cranes. DISCLAIMERS: 1) You are not limited to the abatement methods suggested above. 2) The methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. 3) The employer is responsible for selecting and carrying out an appropriate method.iate
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $437.50
- — Z (S) $875.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Dec 5, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the recognized hazards the overloading of a hydraulic boom crane and/or to the hazards of a dropped load due to the lack of inspections: a) The Dressor Hydraulic Boom Crane and the Galion 150 FA Hydraulic Boom Crane units 8433, 10817, 8950 and 7748 were being used and/or available for use and the required Frequent and Periodic inspections had not been performed. This did expose employees to the hazards of overloading the cranes and dropped loads. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to ensure that the Mobile Hydraulic Cranes receive Periodic and Frequent inspections at the required intervals in accordance with Section 15-2.1.1; Inspections of the Hydraulic Components in accordance with Section 15-2.1.4; and inspection records are maintained in accordance with Section 15-2.1.6 of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) B30.15-1973, Mobile Hydraulic Cranes. DISCLAIMERS: 1) You are not limited to the abatement methods suggested above. 2) The methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. 3) The employer is responsible for selecting and carrying out an appropriate method.iate
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1910.23 A02
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $438 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $437.50
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.101 A
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $438 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $437.50
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.110 B18
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Dec 12, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $438 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $437.50
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.110 D10
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 24, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $438 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $437.50
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1910.157 E02
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Dec 5, 2003
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Dec 5, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $438 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $437.50
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.179 B05
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $438 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $437.50
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.179 I
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $438 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $437.50
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.179 J02 III
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $438 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $437.50
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.179 J03
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $438 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $437.50
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.179 M01
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Dec 5, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $438 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $437.50
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.184 F05 V
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Dec 5, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $438 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $437.50
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.212 A05
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1910.213 I01
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $438 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $437.50
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1910.253 B02 IV
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $438 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $437.50
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.253 B04 III
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $438 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $437.50
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.253 B05 IIB
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $438 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $437.50
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.253 B05 IIIA
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $438 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $437.50
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.254 D09 III
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $375 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $375.00
- — Z (S) $750.00
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1910.303 F
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $1,225 · Current $613 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $612.50
- — Z (S) $1225.00
1910.303 G01 IV
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $263 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $262.50
- — Z (S) $525.00
1910.305 A02 IIIF
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $1,225 · Current $613 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $612.50
- — Z (S) $1225.00
1910.305 A02 IIIG
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $263 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $262.50
- — Z (S) $525.00
1910.305 B01
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 24, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1910.305 G02 II
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $263 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $262.50
- — Z (S) $525.00
1910.305 J01 I
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $375 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $375.00
- — Z (S) $750.00
1910.334 A02 I
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Dec 5, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $263 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $262.50
- — Z (S) $525.00
1910.334 A03 I
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Dec 12, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $750 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $750.00
- — Z (O) $1500.00
1910.106 B02 IIA
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.106 B02 VIIA
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.110 D12 IV
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Dec 19, 2003
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.179 G02 I
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2003
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 24, 2003
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.179 E06 I
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2003
- Abate by
- Nov 28, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
More inspections at Louisiana Concrete Products INC
Mar 8, 1989
BATON ROUGE, LA
Oct 26, 1988
BATON ROUGE, LA
Nov 10, 1987
BATON ROUGE, LA
Mar 18, 1987
BATON ROUGE, LA
Feb 26, 1985
NEW ORLEANS, LA
View Louisiana Concrete Products INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327390)
Jul 15, 2026
Tri-State Quikrete · FLANDERS, NJ
Jul 15, 2026
LAN SE, LLC · KISSIMMEE, FL
Jul 15, 2026
161551 - Lindsay Precast, LLC · FRANKLINTON, NC
Jul 13, 2026
Vault Gallery · GREAT BARRINGTON, MA
Jul 10, 2026
Oldcastle Infrastructure, INC. · OGDEN, UT
More inspections in LA
Jul 15, 2026
SE Tylose USA, INC. · PLAQUEMINE, LA
Jul 15, 2026
Gulley'S Welding & Steel Erectors, INC. · LAFAYETTE, LA
Jul 15, 2026
Acorrea Company, LLC · LAFAYETTE, LA
Jul 14, 2026
Gulf Coast Woodwork, L.L.C. · LAFAYETTE, LA
Jul 14, 2026
Oxychem · BELLE ROSE, LA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 305960288.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.