PONCA CITY, OK —
OSHA Inspection: CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY in 1000 S. PINE, PONCA CITY, OK 74602 (NAICS 324110). OSHA activity number 314932674.
Watch Conocophillips Company — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Conocophillips Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY
- Site address
- 1000 S. PINE
- City
- PONCA CITY
- State
- OK
- ZIP
- 74602
- Mailing
- 1000 S. PINE, PONCA CITY, OK 74602
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 324110
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2911
- Employees
- 650
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
15 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 A02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
CFR 1910.23(a)(2): Every ladderway floor opening or platform was not guarded by a standard railing with standard toeboard on all exposed sides (except at entran ce to opening), with the passage through the railing either provided with a swin ging gate or so offset that a person cannot walk directly into the opening: On o r about July 27, 2011, and at times prior there to, ladder way openings in the S outh Plant were not guarded by a standard railing exposing employees to fall haz ards: a) The ladderway opening of the platform adjacent to vessel D5101. b) The ladderway opening of the platform above vessel D5092. c) The ladderway opening o f the platform above vessel D36. d) The ladderway opening of the platform adjace nt to the Amine Fin Fans.
Recent events (2)
- — R (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.23 A07
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $5000.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(7): Temporary floor opening(s) were not guarded by standard ra ilings or constantly attended by someone: On or about August 4, 2011, and at times prior there to, a 19 inch by 33 inch te mporary floor hole was created during a repair process to the Coker Drum exposin g employees to a fall of approximately 8 feet to a lower level.
Recent events (2)
- — R (O) $5000
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.24 H
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.24(h): Standard railings were not provided on the open sides of all exposed stairways and stair platforms. Stair railings and handrails were not ins talled in accordance with the provisions of 1910.23: On or about July 27, 2011, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure every platform had a sta ndard railing system exposing employees to a fall hazard: a) In the South Plant a stairway with a platform without a railing system was used to access the waste heat boiler mud drum valve. b) In the Main Shop three fixed stairways and stair way platforms were used as access to attach crane clamps to steel plates.
Recent events (2)
- — R (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.119 D03 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5000.00 · Current $5000.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that the equipment in t he process complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering prac tices (RAGAGEP): On or about May 18, 2011, and at times prior thereto, the employer failed to pro vide adequate controls to ensure intervening valves on the upstream or downstrea m lines from relief devices, such as, but not limited to, RV-2066, RV-5264, RV-5 025, and RV-2068, remained in the open position during operation in accordance w ith RAGAGEP such as ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Division 1 (BPVC), Sec tion VIII, UG-135(d). Employees were exposed to fire/explosion and chemical expo sure hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — R (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.119 J02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5000.00 · Current $5000.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2): The employer did not establish and implement written proc edures to maintain the on-going mechanical integrity of process equipment: On or about May 18, 2011, and at times prior thereto, procedure REP 15-4-2A, "Minimum Required Pipe Thickness for Carbon and Low Alloy Steels," did not address the c alculation to determine alert and minimum required thicknesses.
Recent events (2)
- — R (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.119 J04 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(ii): Inspection and testing procedures did not follow recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP): On or ab out May 18, 2011, and at times prior thereto, for the flare lines in the South P lant the employer failed to compile necessary and complete piping inspection rec ords such as corrosion rates, retirement dates and retirement thicknesses in acc ordance with RAGAGEP such as API 570 and ANSI B31.3-2010.
Recent events (2)
- — R (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 J04 IV
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(iv): The inspection and test documentation did not identif y the date of the inspection or test, the name of the person who performed the i nspection or test, the serial number or other identifier of the equipment on whi ch the inspection or test was performed, and a description of the inspection or test performed: On or about May 18, 2011, and at times prior thereto, the employ er did not ensure inspection and testing records for the South Plant flare line, number 36-FL-113-2613-N-A2, included all required documentation for inspections conducted from 1992 to present.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 J05
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer did not correct deficiencies in equipment th at were outside acceptable limits (defined by process safety information in 29 C FR 1910.119(d)) before further use or in a safe and timely manner: On or about M ay 18, 2011, and at times prior thereto, after determining the thickness levels for the South Plant flare line were outside of acceptable limits, the employer c ontinued operation without correcting deficiencies or taking steps to ensure saf e operation.
Recent events (2)
- — R (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 L04
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5000.00 · Current $5000.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(4): A change covered by 29 CFR 1910.119(l) resulted in a chan ge in the process safety information required by 29 CFR 1910.119(d) and the proc ess information was not updated: On or about May 18, 2011, and at times prior th ereto, the employer did not update the South Plant No. 1 Cryogenic Fuel Gas Unit Process Overview to identify Propane as a chemical used in process.
Recent events (2)
- — R (O) $5000
- — Z (O) $5000
1910.1025 I03 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5000.00 · Current $5000.00
General-duty citation text
1910.1025(i)(3)(i): The employer did not assure that employees who work in areas where their airborne exposure to lead is above the PEL, without regard to the us e of respirators, shower at the end of the work shift: On or about June 10, 2011 , and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure contract employees in the Old Main Warehouse exposed to lead over the permissible exposure limit showe red at the end of the work shift.
Recent events (2)
- — R (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.1025 I03 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
1910.1025(i)(3)(iii): The employer did not assure that employees who are require d to shower pursuant to paragraph (i)(3)(i) do not leave the workplace wearing a ny clothing or equipment worn during the work shift: On or about June 10, 2011, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure contract employees in th e Old Main Warehouse exposed to lead over the permissible exposure limit removed their work clothing and boots before leaving the work site.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 E03 IV
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $35000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(iv): The process hazard analysis did not address the consequences of failure of engineering and administrative controls: On or about May 18, 2011, and at times prior there to, the 2005 and 2009 Process Hazard Anal ysis (PHA)/PHA Revalidation for Unit 135 (South Plant, 5FCC/VRU) did not address intervening valves on lines upstream or downstream from relief devices exposing employees to fire/explosion and chemical exposure hazards. CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPA NY WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH S TANDARD, 29 CFR 1910.119 (e)(3)(iv), WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMB ER 310722038, CITATION NUMBER 01, ITEM NUMBER 004(a), AND WAS AFFIRMED AS A FINA L ORDER ON 03/16/2009, WITH RESPECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT 4101 POST ROAD, TR AINER, PA 73061.R,
Recent events (2)
- — R (R) $0
- — Z (R) $0
1910.119 F01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $35000.00 · Current $5000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1): The employer did not develop and implement written operat ing procedures that provided clear instructions for safety conducting activities in each covered process consistent with the process safety information: On or a bout May 18, 2011, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not develop sufficiently detailed written operating procedures. These procedures, among othe rs, were deficient: a)135A-5B Loss of Gas Oil Charge b)135A-7D Fresh Catalyst Tr uck Unloading c)135B-5C Wet Gas Compressor Failure CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY WAS PR EVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD, 29 CFR 1910.119 (f)(1), WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 310722038, CITATION NUMBER 01, ITEM NUMBER 008(a), AND WAS AFFIRMED AS A FINAL ORDER ON 03 /16/2009, WITH RESPECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT 4101 POST ROAD, TRAINER, PA 730 61.R,
Recent events (2)
- — R (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.119 L05
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(5): A change covered 29 CFR 1910.119(l) resulted in a change in the operating procedures or practices required by 29 CFR 1910.119(f), and suc h procedures or practices were not updated: On or about May 18, 2011, and at tim es prior thereto, the employer did not update procedure 135A-7D Fresh Catalyst Truck Unloading when there was a change to the fresh cata lyst addition system. CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATIO N OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD, 29 CFR 1910.119 (l)(5), WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 310722038, CITATION NUMBER 01, ITEM NUM BER 016, AND WAS AFFIRMED AS A FINAL ORDER ON 03/16/2009, WITH RESPECT TO A WORK PLACE LOCATED AT 4101 POST ROAD, TRAINER, PA 73061.
Recent events (2)
- — R (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 G02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(g)(2): The employer did not provide refresher training at least every three years to the each employee involved in operating a process to assure that the employee understands and adheres to the current operating procedures o f the process: On or about May 18, 2011, and at times prior thereto, the employe r did not verify that refresher training assured employees understood and adhere d to the current operating procedures of the process.es
Recent events (2)
- — R (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY
WATFORD CITY, ND—2024-06-11 00:00:00
CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY
WATFORD CITY, ND—2023-02-24 00:00:00
CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY
KENEDY, TX—2011-06-02 00:00:00
CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY
RODEO, CA—2011-05-27 00:00:00
CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY
PEGGY, TX—2011-05-26 00:00:00
CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY
View CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 324110)
TORRANCE, CA—2026-07-15 00:00:00
TORRANCE REFINING COMPANY LLC
NOME, TX—2026-07-13 00:00:00
EXXON MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
EL SEGUNDO, CA—2026-06-30 00:00:00
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
EL SEGUNDO, CA—2026-06-30 00:00:00
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
TRAINER, PA—2026-06-26 00:00:00
MONROE ENERGY, LLC
More inspections in OK
TULSA, OK—2026-07-15 00:00:00
LA UNION 7 LLC
BROKEN ARROW, OK—2026-07-10 00:00:00
AMERICAN WHEATLEY
TINKER AFB, OK—2026-07-09 00:00:00
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, TINKER AIR FORCE BASE
OCHELATA, OK—2026-07-08 00:00:00
WALMART, INC.
MADILL, OK—2026-07-08 00:00:00
MID AMERICAN STEEL & WIRE CO., LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 314932674.