Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

ROTTERDAM JUNCTION, NY —

OSHA Inspection: SI GROUP, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

At a glance

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of SI GROUP, INC. in 1000 MAIN ST., ROTTERDAM JUNCTION, NY 12150 (NAICS 325211). OSHA activity number 336803580.

Watch SI Group, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for SI Group, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

Where did this inspection happen?

Establishment
SI GROUP, INC.
Site address
1000 MAIN ST.
City
ROTTERDAM JUNCTION
State
NY
ZIP
12150
Mailing
PO BOX 1046, SCHENECTADY, NY 12301

What kind of inspection was it?

Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A

When did the case open and close?

Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded

Establishment context

NAICS code
325211
Employees
165
Ownership type
A

Citations

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 D01 VI

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 35 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $5000.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(1)(vi):     Process safety information pertaining to the hazards of the highly hazardous chemicals in the process did not contain thermal and chemical stability data:    A)  Building 9 and Building 9/39 RTO - On or prior to October 10, 2012, process safety information for the regenerative thermal oxidizer and Process 3C did not contain information on the thermal degradation of the product during the manufacture of SC-204I.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.119 E03 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 35 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $5000.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(i):     The process hazard analysis did not address the hazards of the process.    A) Building 9 and Building 9/39 RTO - On or prior to October 10, 2012, the process hazard analysis for Process 3C did not address the thermal stability of the product.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.119 L02 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 35 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.119(l)(2)(ii):     The management of change procedures did not assure that the impact of changes on safety and health were addressed prior to any change.    A) Building 9 and Building 9/39 RTO - On or prior to October 10, 2012, the management of change procedures for the manufacture of SC-204I not address thermal stability.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 E03 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 35 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $5000.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(v):     The process hazard analysis did not address facility siting.    A) Building 9/39 RTO - On or prior to October 10, 2012, the process hazard analysis for the Building 9/39 RTO did not address facility siting pertaining to steel access panels striking a vehicle or person on the access road, which was adjacent to the RTO.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.119 E03 VI

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 35 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $5000.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(vi):     The process hazard analysis did not address human factors:    A) Building 9 and Building 9/39 RTO - On or prior to October 12, 2012, the process hazard analysis for Process 3C did not address the hazards of an operator venting a kettle too quickly.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.119 F01 I B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 35 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $5000.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(i)(B):     The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and did not address normal operations.    A) Building 9 - On or prior to October 10, 2012, the SOP for RK-03/04 did not specify the rates of pressure venting to the RTO.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $7000

More inspections at SI GROUP, INC.

View SI GROUP, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

More inspections in this industry (NAICS 325211)

More inspections in NY

Source

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 336803580.