STAMFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: ENCOMPASS DIGITAL MEDIA, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ENCOMPASS DIGITAL MEDIA, LLC in 250 HARBOR DR, STAMFORD, CT 06902 (NAICS 541840). OSHA activity number 337472617.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ENCOMPASS DIGITAL MEDIA, LLC
- Site address
- 250 HARBOR DR
- City
- STAMFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06902
- Mailing
- 250 HARBOR DR, STAMFORD, CT 06902
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 541840
- Employees
- 676
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.38 C02
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $6,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.38(c)(2): Procedures for emergency evacuation, including type of evacuation and exit route assignments were not implemented by the employer: Facility: The employer did not establish and implement the emergency evacuation procedures, including the type of the evacuation and exit route assignments.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $6000
1910.38 C03
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.38(c)(3): The emergency action plan did not include the procedures to be followed by employees who remain to operate critical plant operations before they evacuate. Facility: The employer did not identify and address procedures to be followed by personnel required to remain to operate critical plant operaqtions prior to evacuation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.38 C04
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.38(c)(4): The employer did not establish procedures to account for all employees after an evacuation: Facility: The employer did not develop an effective method to account for the employees after an evacuation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.160 B05
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 8, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.160(b)(5): Hazard warning or caution signs were not posted at the entrance to, and inside of, areas protected by fixed extinguishing systems which use agents in concentrations known to be hazardous to employee safety and health: Facility: The employer did not post hazard warning or caution signs at the entrance to, and inside of, areas protected by fixed Halon extinguishing systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 541840)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337472617.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.