Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: WHITE AND BLUE GROUP CORP.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of WHITE AND BLUE GROUP CORP. in 35-11 43RD AVE., LONG ISLAND CITY, NY 11104 (NAICS 485310). OSHA activity number 338914658.

Watch White AND Blue Group Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for White AND Blue Group Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
35-11 43RD AVE.
City
LONG ISLAND CITY
State
NY
ZIP
11104
Mailing
35-11 43RD AVE., LONG ISLAND CITY, NY 11104
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
485310
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 C05

Serious Gravity 5 8 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(5):  Electrical equipment in any spraying area whereon deposits of combustible residues may accumulate was not approved for locations containing both deposits of readily ignitable residue and explosive vapors:         (a) In the Spray Area - Heaters, outlets, conduits and lighting were not approved for this location; on or about 02/22/13.         NOTE:  THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM IN THE ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.107 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(2):  Spraying areas were not kept free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues:      (a) In the Spray Area - Combustible residues accumulated on the walls and outlets; on or about 02/22/13.      NOTE:  THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM IN THE ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 D05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(d)(5):  Electric motors driving exhaust fans were placed inside booths or ducts:     (a)  In the Spray Area - The fan motor was located inside the room where flammable liquids were sprayed; on or about 02/22/13.    NOTE:  THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM IN THE ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.107 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(f)(1):  Sprinkler heads were not located as to provide water distribution throughout the entire booth:     (a)  In the Spray Area - Flammable liquids were sprayed and no sprinkler system was provided; on or about 02/22/13.     NOTE:  THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM IN THE ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):  A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:      (a)  In the Spray Area - A written respiratory protection program was not established for employees who were required to wear half-mask respirators to spray acrylic enamel; on or about 02/22/13.      NOTE:  THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM IN THE ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:        (a)  In the Spray Area - Employees who were required to wear half-mask respirator to acrylic enamel were not medically evaluated; on or about 02/22/13.        NOTE:  THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM IN THE ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1):  The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):        (a)  In the Spray Area - Employeed who were required to wear a half-mask respirator to acrylic enamel were not fit tested; on or about 02/22/13.        NOTE:  THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM IN THE ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1):  The employer did not provide effective training to employees who are required to wear respirators in accordance with this paragraph:        (a)  In the Spray Area - Employees required to wear half mask respirator to spray acrylic enamel were not provided training; on or about 02/22/13.        NOTE:  THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM IN THE ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:      (a) At the worksite - The employer did not maintain a written Hazard Communication Program for chemicals such as but not limited to acrylic enamel, body filler, thinner and hardener; on or about 02/22/13.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 6 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical which they used:      (a) At the worksite  - The employer did not maintain material safety data sheets for hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, body filler, hardener, filler, transmission fluid, anti-freeze and motor oil; on or about 02/22/13.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H

Other-than-serious 8 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h): Employees were not provided effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and -2 on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into their work area:                                                                                                                                                  (a) At the worksite - For the employee who used chemicals such as but not limited to acrylice enamel, thinner and hardener; on or about 02/22/13.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View WHITE AND BLUE GROUP CORP.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338914658.