WEST HAVEN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: BERNARDINO PINEDA
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BERNARDINO PINEDA in 365 SAVIN AVENUE, WEST HAVEN, CT 06516 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339122244.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BERNARDINO PINEDA
- Site address
- 365 SAVIN AVENUE
- City
- WEST HAVEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06516
- Mailing
- 994 CAMPBELL AVENUE 1ST FLOOR, WEST HAVEN, CT 06516
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.25 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs, debris was not kept cleared from work areas, passageways, and stairs, in and around buildings or other structures: JOBSITE: The construction debris, such as (but not limited to) broken pieces of lumber and old roofing material was scattered on the ground in and around the walking/working area.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: JOBSITE: The employees, walking/working on the ground underneath the overhead work were not protected by protective helmets from falling objects.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): JOBSITE: The employee, engaged in installing roof sheathing on the steep pitched (8 in 12 pitch) roof, was not protected from the hazard of falling between 20 feet 11 inches to 36 feet to the ground by guardrails, personal fall arrest system or other equivalent means.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: JOBSITE: The employee, exposed to the hazard of falling while installing roofing sheathings on the steep pitched (8 in 12 pitch) roof was not provided with information and training to control or minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways: JOBSITE: The employees, using a fiberglass extension ladder to have access to an upper working level were not provided with information and training regarding the safe use and handling of the ladder.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder�s length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: JOBSITE: The side rails of the fiberglass extension ladder, used by the employees as a means of access to the upper working deck did not extend at least 3 feet above the roof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B05 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support: JOBSITE: The horizontal distance from the vertical support to the base of the 40 foot fibeglass extension ladder which was used by the employees to access the upper working deck of a house to perform work was more than one fourth (1/4) of the working length of the ladder.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
SIOUX FALLS, SD—2026-07-13
H & R ROOFING OF SOUTH DAKOTA, INC.
HENDERSON, NV—2026-07-13
INTEGRITY ROOFING LLC
CORTLANDT MANOR, NY—2026-07-13
LG BUILDERS INC.
CAMDEN, OH—2026-07-13
ALBERTO MORALES
BLOOMINGTON, IL—2026-07-13
UNKNOWN CONTRACTOR
More inspections in CT
BRIDGEPORT, CT—2026-07-10
WRR, INC.
BERLIN, CT—2026-07-10
MMF CONSTRUCTION LLC
NAUGATUCK, CT—2026-07-08
WHITING-TURNER LCT2 JOINT VENTURE
SOMERS, CT—2026-07-08
F&G RECYCLING LLC
STAMFORD, CT—2026-07-07
FAIRFIELD AVENUE MAINTENANCE COMPANY, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339122244.