DELAND, FL —
OSHA Inspection: HOPTON ROOFING, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HOPTON ROOFING, INC. in 215 S. WOODEN BLVD, DELAND, FL 32720 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339188054.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HOPTON ROOFING, INC.
- Site address
- 215 S. WOODEN BLVD
- City
- DELAND
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32720
- Mailing
- 1309 DUROC DRIVE, LAKE HELEN, FL 32744
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.302 A01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $1600.00 · Current $1050.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.302(a)(1): The noncurrent-carrying metal parts of electrical power operated hand tool(s) were not grounded, or of the approved double insulated type: a. On or about July 10, 2013, on the west side of the building, the DEWALT saw used for cutting the bad wood was not of the approved double insulated type, exposing employees to an electrical shock hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1050
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $1050.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift: a. On or about July 10, 2013, employees working from aerial lifts were not wearing harnesses and lanyards attached to the boom or basket, exposing themselves to a 25 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1050
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1050.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system: a. On or about July 10, 2013, on the 2:12 pitch roof, employees performing roofing work were not protected from a 12 feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1050
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a. On or about July 10, 2013, on the 5:12 pitch roof, employees performing roofing work were not protected from a 25 feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a. On or about July 10, 2013, employees performing roofing work were not trained to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards, exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $1050.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladders length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a. On or about July 10, 2013, on the west side of the building, the ladder used to access the roof did not extend 3 feet above the landing, exposing employees to a 12 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1050
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections at HOPTON ROOFING, INC.
ORMOND BEACH, FL—2024-11-14 00:00:00
HOPTON ROOFING, INC.
LAKE HELEN, FL—2017-02-14 00:00:00
HOPTON ROOFING, INC.
NEW SMYRNA BEACH, FL—2015-11-06 00:00:00
HOPTON ROOFING, INC.
DAYTONA BEACH, FL—2006-09-25 00:00:00
HOPTON ROOFING, INC.
View HOPTON ROOFING, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
FAIRVIEW, TN—2026-07-16
MARVIN PINERA
CARSON CITY, NV—2026-07-16
UNKNOWN/INVALID ESTABLISHMENT
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
ROOFING H.P. LLC
LOXLEY, AL—2026-07-16
CARLOS CHE
BALTIMORE, MD—2026-07-16
VAL CONSTRUCTION INC
More inspections in FL
MARIANNA, FL—2026-07-16
BRANNON BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, LLC
LAKELAND, FL—2026-07-16
SOUTHERN MILLING & LUMBER, INC.
OAKLAND PARK, FL—2026-07-16
PKB CABINETRY
LAKELAND, FL—2026-07-16
ELIJAH WHOLESALE, LLC.
TAMPA, FL—2026-07-16
VALENCIA WHOLESALE, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339188054.