AUSTIN, TX —
OSHA Inspection: ROBERT MOREY
Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of ROBERT MOREY in 13120 LUNA MONTANA WAY, AUSTIN, TX 78732 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339428450.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ROBERT MOREY
- Site address
- 13120 LUNA MONTANA WAY
- City
- AUSTIN
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78732
- Mailing
- 291 ROLAND LN BOX 47, KYLE, TX 78640
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1600.00 · Current $800.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe condition(s) and the regulation(s) applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazard(s) or other exposure to illness or injury. On or about 27 September 2013, the employer did not ensure that employees were provided job site safety training while performing framing work on the residential home under construction, exposing employees to hazards such as, but not limited to being struck by falling objects and electrical shock.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.50 C
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.50(c): A person who has a valid certificate in first-aid training was not available at the worksite to render first-aid. On or about 27 September 2013, at a residential home under construction, three employees were exposed to the hazards associated with a delay of medical response. No employee on site had attended an approved certified first aid training class.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $500
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1600.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns. On or about 27 September 2013, three employees were performing framing activities at a residential home under construction. Employees worked beneath an employee who was using a pneumatic nail gun and passed pieces of lumber up to the second level plate without the use of head protection, exposing the employees to the hazard of being struck by falling objects.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $500
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.405 G02 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1200.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not used in continuous lengths without splice or tap. On or about 27 September 2013, employees were utilizing a 120-V, orange extension cord that was spliced to a white power strip and wrapped with black electrical tape, exposing the employees to an electrical shock hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $500
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.405 G02 IV
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws. On or about 27 September 2013, employees were utilizing a 120-volt, red flexible cord that was not equipped with strain relief, exposing the employees to an electrical shock hazard where electrical conductors were exposed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Scaffold platforms and walkways were not at least 18 inches wide. On or about 27 September 2013, three employees were required to work from a temporary elevated, job-made scaffold, up to approximately 20 feet high without the platform being at least 18 inches wide, exposing the employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. On or about 27 September 2013, three employees were required to work from a temporary elevated job-made scaffold set up by the employer up to approximately 20 feet high without fall protection, exposing the employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. On or about 27 September 2013, three employees were working on a job-made scaffold at a residential home under construction without being trained by the employer to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffolding being used, exposing the employees to a fall hazard up to approximately 20 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $7000.00 · Current $7000.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: On or about 27 September 2013, three employees were installing joists on the second floor of a residential house under construction without the use of fall protection, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of up to approximately 20 feet to the concrete floor below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. On or about 27 September 2013, two employees were installing joists on the second floor of a residential house under construction without the employer providing fall protection training, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of approximately 20 feet to the concrete floor below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 A02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1600.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(a)(2): Ladder rungs, cleats, and/or steps were not parallel, level, and uniformly spaced when the ladder was in position for use: Also applies to job-made ladders. On or about 27 September 2013, employees were utilizing a job-made ladder that was attached to a wall in the family room area to access the second floor of the residential home under construction up to approximately 13 feet high. The ladder was not uniformly spaced, exposing the employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $500
- — Z (S) $1600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
ENCINITAS, CA—2026-07-13
LOU RIDDLE CONSTRUCTION
MERIDIAN, ID—2026-07-10
IDAHO HOMES CONSTRUCTION LLC
KIMBERLY, WI—2026-07-10
ENRIQUE RESENDIC
METTER, GA—2026-07-10
M.A.P.C CONSTRUCTION, LLC
SLINGER, WI—2026-07-10
RAMIREZ HOME BUILDERS LLC
More inspections in TX
SPRING, TX—2026-07-10
DORSTENER WIRE TECH INC.
FORT WORTH, TX—2026-07-10
RC PROFESSIONAL ROOFING OF TEXAS LLC
CYPRESS, TX—2026-07-10
FEDERICO CARVAJAL GARCIA
SAN ANTONIO, TX—2026-07-10
ED LONG'S METAL WORKS
SAN ANTONIO, TX—2026-07-09
WAREHOUSE RACK COMPANY, LP
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339428450.