Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
3,913,242Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: CHICAGO STEEL CONTAINER CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CHICAGO STEEL CONTAINER CORPORATION in 1846 SOUTH KILBOURNE, CHICAGO, IL 60623 (NAICS 811310). OSHA activity number 339496689.

Watch Chicago Steel Container Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Chicago Steel Container Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1846 SOUTH KILBOURNE
City
CHICAGO
State
IL
ZIP
60623
Mailing
1846 SOUTH KILBOURNE, CHICAGO, IL 60623
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811310
Employees
62
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 20 instances 42 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4900.00 · Current $2450.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i):   Procedures shall be developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in the activities covered by this section.  Throughout facility - On or about November 12, 2013, procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy, thereby exposing employees to the unexpected re-energization of machinery.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 42 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i):   The employer shall conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard are being followed.  Throughout facility - On or about November 12, 2013, the employer had not performed periodic inspections to ensure that documented lockout/tagout procedures were being followed by authorized employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 10 42 instances 50 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i):   The employer shall provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees. The training shall include the following:  Throughout facility - On or about November 12, 2013, the employer did not provide effective training to authorized, affected, and other new employees to include all of the elements in (a) through (c), thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with unexpected re-energization of equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 F03 II D

Serious Gravity 10 10 instances 12 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(D): Each authorized employee shall affix a personal lockout or tagout device to the group lockout device, group lockbox, or comparable mechanism when he or she begins work, and shall remove those devices when he or she stops working on the machine or equipment being serviced or maintained.  Throughout Facility - On or about November 12, 2013, personal lockout or tagout devices were not attached to a group lockout device when two employees were repairing the shell washers and other operating equipment, thereby exposing employees to the hazards of the unexpected re-energization of equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4900.00 · Current $2450.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.  Production Shop - On or about November 12, 2013, the employer failed to guard the bottom welder, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with rotating parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4900.00 · Current $2450.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.   Production Shop - On or about November 12, 2013, the Niagara Shear No. 44-B did not have the points of operation completely guarded to prevent employees from reaching into the hazardous areas.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.219 F03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2100.00 · Current $1050.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3):   Sprockets and chains. All sprocket wheels and chains shall be enclosed unless they are more than seven (7) feet above the floor or platform. Where the drive extends over other machine or working areas, protection against falling shall be provided. This subparagraph does not apply to manually operated sprockets.  Packaging - On or about November 12, 2013, a chain and sprockets entering the painting operation were not completely guarded, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with moving parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1050
  • — Z (S) $2100

View CHICAGO STEEL CONTAINER CORPORATION's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339496689.