Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SIGNART COMPANY, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SIGNART COMPANY, INC. in 2933 MONDOVI RD, EAU CLAIRE, WI 54701 (NAICS 339950). OSHA activity number 339497893.

Watch Signart Company, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Signart Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2933 MONDOVI RD
City
EAU CLAIRE
State
WI
ZIP
54701
Mailing
2933 MONDOVI RD, EAU CLAIRE, WI 54701
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
339950
Employees
27
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 E09 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1785.00 · Current $893.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(9)(iii): Combustible waste material and residues in a building or unit operating area were not kept to a minimum, stored in covered metal receptacles and disposed of daily:    a) Flammable Storage Room; metal receptacle is not equipped with a cover and waste is not disposed of daily.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $893
  • — Z (S) $1785

1910.132 D01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2100.00 · Current $1050.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(i): The employer did not select and have each affected employee use, the types of personal protective equipment that would protect the affected employee(s) from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment:      a) Throughout the establishment; the employer failed to adequately assess the workplace and have affected employees use identified PPE:  Such as, but not limited to eye protection for grinding, hearing protection for router operations, and protective clothing for welding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1050
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant�s chemical state and physical form:  (a) Throughout the facility; the employer failed to evaluate employee exposure to respiratory hazard(s):  Such as, but not limited to the "drying" area where items sit when removed from the spray booth and any possibility of spray booth exhaust re-circulating into the building.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2100.00 · Current $1050.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:      (a) Spray booth operations; the employer failed to fit-test employees prior to the initial use of the One Man Full-Face Opti-Fit supplied Air System provided and required by the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1050
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.134 G01 I A

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:   (a) Spray booth operations; the employer allows the use of a tight-fitting full facepiece with facial hair interference of the sealing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 I05 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(5)(i): Compressors used to supply breathing air to respirators were not so constructed and situated so as to prevent entry of contaminated air into the air-supply system:    (a) Spray Booth operations area; The employer has not guaranteed a clean air environment at all times.  In the current location, the pump is using air that could be contaminated by paint mixing operations or other harmful vapors and gases due to proximity to flammable/combustible storage and area of operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 I05 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(5)(iii): The compressor's sorbent bed and filters were not maintained and replaced or refurbished periodically as instructed by the manufacturer:  (a) Spray Booth area; The employer does not have any practice or schedule in place to maintain and/or replace filters according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 I05 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(5)(iv): The employer did not ensure that the person authorized to perform the necessary sorbent bed and filter changes filled out a tag indicating by the signature and date that maintenance changes were performed:  (a) Spray Booth operations area; The employer does not maintain a tag at the compressor showing the most recent filter change date with signature of the authorized person.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.94 C07 III B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.94(c)(7)(iii)(b): The rating of filters shall be governed by test data supplied by the manufacturer of the filter. A pressure gage shall be installed to show the pressure drop across the filters. This gage shall be marked to show the pressure drop at which the filters require cleaning or replacement. Filters shall be replaced or cleaned whenever the pressure drop across them becomes excessive or whenever the air flow through the face of the booth falls below that specified in Table G-10.   (a) Spray Booth operations area;  The employer failed to monitor and maintain the operation of a manometer pressure gage device along with test data by the manufacturer of the filters used in the spray booth to provide an adequate filter change schedule.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339497893.