Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: LONE STAR ENERGY FABRICATION LLC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LONE STAR ENERGY FABRICATION LLC. in 2050 FARM MARKET ROAD 1405, BAYTOWN, TX 77523 (NAICS 237120). OSHA activity number 339670507.

Watch Lone Star Energy Fabrication LLC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lone Star Energy Fabrication LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2050 FARM MARKET ROAD 1405
City
BAYTOWN
State
TX
ZIP
77523
Mailing
2050 FARM MARKET ROAD 1405, BAYTOWN, TX 77523
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237120
Employees
480
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.184 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3000.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(1): Alloy steel sling(s) did not have permanently affixed durable identification stating size, grade, rated capacity, and reach:    In the South side of bay 3 on April 10, 2014, employees were using alloy steel chain slings that did not have an identification tag affixed, exposing employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $3500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    On the south side of Bay 1, on April 10, 2014, employee operated an unguarded HYD-Mech horizontal band saw, Model M-20A, Serial number T11086B1, exposing employees to amputations hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1000.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    In the North end of welding bay 1, on April 10, 2014, an employee was wearing half face respirators and had not received a medical evaluation prior to using the respirator, exposing the employee to health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $500
  • — Z (O) $1000

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1000.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting face piece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):    In the North end of welding Bay 1 on April 10, 2014, the employer did not ensure that employees were fit tested before issuing respirators, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $500
  • — Z (O) $1000

1910.157 E03

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1000.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check:    a. In bay 3 on April 10, 2014, the employer did not conduct an annual inspection or maintenance check on fire extinguisher number 22, exposing employees to fire hazards.    b. In bay 3 on April 10, 2014, the employer did not conduct an annual inspection or maintenance check on fire extinguisher number 31, exposing employees to fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $500
  • — Z (O) $1000

1910.1026 D02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1000.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(2)(i): The employer using the scheduled monitoring option did not perform initial monitoring to determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure to chromium (VI) for each employee on the basis of a sufficient number of personal breathing zone air samples to accurately characterize full shift exposure on each shift, for each job classification, in each work area:    On the North side of Bay one, April 10, 2014, the employer did not conduct initial chromium monitoring to determine the time weighted average, exposing employees to unknown levels of chromium.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $500
  • — Z (O) $1000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339670507.