Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SILCO INCORPORATED

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SILCO INCORPORATED in 7635 ST. CLAIRE AVE., MENTOR, OH 44060 (NAICS 325991). OSHA activity number 339674038.

Watch Silco Incorporated — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Silco Incorporated is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SILCO INCORPORATED
Site address
7635 ST. CLAIRE AVE.
City
MENTOR
State
OH
ZIP
44060
Mailing
7635 ST. CLAIRE AVE., MENTOR, OH 44060
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325991
Employees
21
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $960.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers was not provided, used, and/or maintained:    At the time of inspection, the employer did not provide personal protective equipment including, but not limited to, steel toe boots where employees are expected to move 50 gallon barrels of silicone by hand.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.178 L

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $960.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l): Operators were not trained in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks:    On and before 4/10/2014, the employer did not provide a training and certification program for employees operating the powered industrial vehicles.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $960.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    Machinery including, but not limited to, the Prosys Cartridge Filler #3, Model# R-110, Serial# S737, did not have functioning interlocks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    At the time of inspection, the employer failed to establish an energy control program. Employees were entering the Prosys Cartridge Filler #3. Model# R-110, Serial# S737 by stopping the machine with the emergency stop switch.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.38 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.38(a): The employer did not establish a written emergency evacuation plan for employees expected to evacuate in the event of a fire or other emergency.  At the time of inspection, the employer failed to establish a written emergency evacuation plan.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:    At the time of inspection, the employer did not train employees that are potentially exposed to chemicals on the revised Hazard Communication Standard (HCS), label elements, and the new format and types of information on each section of the Safety Data Sheets (SDS). Chemicals including, but not limited to, Dow Corning(R) 3-7132 Premium Acetoxy Sealant - P Clear.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View SILCO INCORPORATED's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339674038.