FOLEY, AL —
OSHA Inspection: CHRIS NORMAN
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of CHRIS NORMAN in 22171 US HWY 98, FOLEY, AL 36535 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 339767295.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CHRIS NORMAN
- Site address
- 22171 US HWY 98
- City
- FOLEY
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 36535
- Mailing
- 10933 ARMY ROAD, CHUNCHULA, AL 36521
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238120
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.760 A01
- Issued
- May 28, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.760(a)(1): Each employee engaged in a steel erection activity who is on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge more than 15 feet (4.6 m) above a lower level was not protected from fall hazards by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, positioning device systems, or fall restraint systems: a) Unprotected sides of installed roof: On or about May 13, 2014, the employer did not implement and/or require use of a fall protection method while working on the roof which exposed employees to falls of 16-feet to the ground below. b) Leading edge of roof being installed: On or about May 13, 2014, the employer did not implement and/or require use of a fall protection method while working on the roof which exposed employees to falls of 16-feet to the ground below. c) Horizontal beams: On or about May 13, 2014, the employer did not implement and/or require use of a fall protection method while walking on the beams between the ladder and roof which exposed employees to falls of 16-feet to the ground below.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $2800
- — I (S) $1880
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- May 28, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $1,700
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend to at least 3 feet (.9m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access nor was the ladder secured at it's top to a rigid support and a grasping device, such as a grab rail, provided to assist the employee in mounting and dismounting the ladder: a) Extension Ladder: On or about May 13, 2014, the employer did not ensure the ladder was secured at the top when the rails did not extend at least 3-feet above the landing surface which exposed employees to falls of 16-feet to the ground.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $1700
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $1700
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238120)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339767295.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.