Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: RLR INDUSTRIES, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of RLR INDUSTRIES, INC. in 575 DISCOVERY PL, MABLETON, GA 30126 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 339840621.

Watch RLR Industries, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for RLR Industries, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
575 DISCOVERY PL
City
MABLETON
State
GA
ZIP
30126
Mailing
575 DISCOVERY PLACE, MABLETON, GA 30126
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
100
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1052 C01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5390.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1730

29 CFR 1910.1052(c)(1): The employer did not ensure that no employee(s) was exposed to an airborne concentration of methylene chloride in excess of twenty-five parts per million as an 8-hour TWA:  a)  Hop Area - An employee performing plastic welding was exposed to airborne methylene chloride at an 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) of 773.03 parts per million, which was 31 times the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 25 parts per million.  The exposure level was derived from three samples collected over a 413 minute sampling period on July 22, 2014.  Zero exposure was assumed for the minutes not sampled.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5390
  • — Z (S) $5390

1910.1052 F01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1730

29 CFR 1910.1052(f)(1): The employer did not institute and maintain the effectiveness of engineering controls and work practices to reduce employee exposure to or below the permissible exposure limits:  a)  Hop Area - An employee performing plastic welding was exposed to airborne methylene chloride at an 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) of 773.03 parts per million, which was 31 times the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 25 parts per million.  The exposure level was derived from three samples collected over a 413 minute sampling period on July 22, 2014.  Zero exposure was assumed for the minutes not sampled. The employer did not implement engineering or work practice controls to minimize employee exposure to methylene chloride.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1052 E03

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1730

29 CFR 1910.1052(e)(3): The employer did not require each affected employee to use a respirator whenever methylene chloride exposures were likely to exceed the 8-hour time weighted average permissible exposure limit or short term exposure limit:  a)  Hop Area - An employee performing plastic welding was exposed to airborne methylene chloride at an 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) of 773.03 parts per million, which was 31 times the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 25 parts per million.  The exposure level was derived from three samples collected over a 413 minute sampling period on July 22, 2014.  Zero exposure was assumed for the minutes not sampled.  The employer did not provide respiratory protection to the employee.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1052 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1730

29 CFR 1910.1052(e)(1): The employer did not establish a regulated area wherever an employee's exposure to airborne concentrations of methylene chloride exceeded or could reasonably be expected to exceed either the 8-hour Time Weighted Average Permissible Exposure Limit or the Short Term Exposure Limit:  a)  Hop Area - An employee performing plastic welding was exposed to airborne methylene chloride at an 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) of 773.03 parts per million, which was 31 times the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 25 parts per million.  The exposure level was derived from three samples collected over a 413 minute sampling period on July 22, 2014.  Zero exposure was assumed for the minutes not sampled.  The employer did not regulate the work area where the plastic welding with methylene chloride took place.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1052 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3850.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1730

29 CFR 1910.1052(h)(1): Where needed to prevent methylene chloride induced skin or eye irritation, the employer did not provide clean protective clothing and equipment resistant to methylene chloride, at no cost to the employee, and/or did not ensure that each affected employee used it:    a)  Injecting Molding and Hop Area - Employees used 99.9% methylene chloride while performing plastic welding.  The gloves provided by the employer were not resistant to methylene chloride.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $1500
  • — C (S) $3850
  • — Z (S) $3850

1910.1052 J01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5390.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1730

29 CFR 1910.1052(j)(1)(i): The employer did not make medical surveillance available for employees who were or potentially were  exposed to methylene chloride at or above the action level on 30 or more days per year, or above the 8-hour time weighted average permissible exposure limit or the short term exposure limit on 10 or more days per year:  a)  Hop Area - An employee performing plastic welding was exposed to airborne methylene chloride at an 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) of 773.03 parts per million, which was 31 times the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 25 parts per million.  The exposure level was derived from three samples collected over a 413 minute sampling period on July 22, 2014.  Zero exposure was assumed for the minutes not sampled.  The employee had not been offered medical surveillance.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5390
  • — Z (S) $5390

View RLR INDUSTRIES, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339840621.