MADISON, WI —
OSHA Inspection: BEST IN HOMES, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BEST IN HOMES, LLC in LANGDON STREET, MADISON, WI 53713 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 339847071.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BEST IN HOMES, LLC
- Site address
- LANGDON STREET
- City
- MADISON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53713
- Mailing
- 2405 AFTON ROAD, BELOIT, WI 53511
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $400.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. The employer failed to provide information documenting the abatement of the following cited hazards: a. Employees were exposed to the dangers of falling objects while engaged in roofing activities and were not protected by protective helmets. b. Employees were tearing shingles off a residential roof and were not protected from falling to lower levels.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $400
- — Z (O) $400
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $980.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets. On or about July 11, 2014, employees were exposed to the dangers of falling objects while engaged in roofing activities and were not protected by protective helmets.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $980
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $980.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. On or about July 11, 2014, employees were tearing shingles off a residential roof and were not protected from falling to lower levels.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $980
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $980.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support. On or about July 11, 2014, employees were using portable ladders to access the upper landing of the roof and the ladder did not extend at least three feet higher than the upper landing.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $980
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
CORTLANDT MANOR, NY—2026-07-13
RJW RENOVATIONS, LLC
VANCOUVER, WA—2026-07-08
WA317991978 - DLS CONTRACTING INC
NEWPORT BEACH, CA—2026-07-08
DRAKE SMITH CONSTRUCTION
BRIDGEVILLE, PA—2026-07-08
EXTREME DECKS
COLUMBUS, OH—2026-07-07
QUALITY BUILDS OHIO LLC
More inspections in WI
MUSCODA, WI—2026-07-10
SCOT INDUSTRIES, INC
FRANKLIN, WI—2026-07-10
EDGE BROADBAND SOLUTIONS LLC
APPLETON, WI—2026-07-10
LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
KIMBERLY, WI—2026-07-10
ENRIQUE RESENDIC
SLINGER, WI—2026-07-10
DYLAN MATTHEW SHELLEY LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339847071.