MADISONVILLE, LA —
OSHA Inspection: LOUISIANA CYPRESS LUMBER COMPANY, L.L.C.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LOUISIANA CYPRESS LUMBER COMPANY, L.L.C. in 451 HIGHWAY 22 WEST, MADISONVILLE, LA 70447 (NAICS 423310). OSHA activity number 339943730.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LOUISIANA CYPRESS LUMBER COMPANY, L.L.C.
- Site address
- 451 HIGHWAY 22 WEST
- City
- MADISONVILLE
- State
- LA
- ZIP
- 70447
- Mailing
- 110 NORTH DR., COVINGTON, LA 70433
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423310
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Oct 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toe boards: On or about September 9, 2014, in the southwest corner, on the second floor of the building, the employer failed to ensure that a guardrail system complete with toe boards was installed. Employees were working in the area while measuring for a storage racking system.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $250
- — C (S) $1700
- — Z (S) $1700
1910.213 D01
- Issued
- Oct 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.213(d)(1): Circular handfed crosscut table saw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut: On or about September 4, 2014, in the front shop area, the employer failed to ensure that the Jet saw was guarded. Employees use the saw one time per week to cut large pieces of wood.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $250
- — C (S) $1600
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.213 I01
- Issued
- Oct 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.213(i)(1): Non-working portion(s) of the blade of bandsaw(s) were not enclosed or guarded: On or about September 9, 2014, in the southwest corner of the shop, the employer failed to ensure that non-working portions of the blade were guarded. The employer used the saw one time to make sure that it was operational.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- Oct 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries: On or about September 9, 2014, the employ3er failed to ensure that fire extinguishers were readily accessible. The employer expected employees to put out small fires and call emergency services if necessary.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Oct 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): On or about September 9, 2014, the employer failed to ensure that a hazard communication program was developed and implemented. Employees used chemicals such as but not limited to Tite Bond III, Poly Shades Stain & Polyurethane, and Turpentine.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423310)
More inspections in LA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339943730.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.