DAYTON, OH —
OSHA Inspection: TRI-COUNTY UROLOGY
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TRI-COUNTY UROLOGY in 8934 KINGSRIDGE DRIVE SUITE 102, DAYTON, OH 45458 (NAICS 621112). OSHA activity number 339953481.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TRI-COUNTY UROLOGY
- Site address
- 8934 KINGSRIDGE DRIVE SUITE 102
- City
- DAYTON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45458
- Mailing
- 8934 KINGSRIDGE DRIVE SUITE 102, DAYTON, OH 45458
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 621112
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1030 G02 I
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $1,190 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee with occupational exposure participated in a training program a) The employer did not ensure that employees received initial training in that a temporary employee had assisted with medical procedures with potential for blood exposure for approximately 1 week and had not received initial training; b) The employer did not ensure that employees received annual training in that the last training documentation was 2009.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1190
- — Z (S) $1700
1910.1030 C01 II
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii): The employer's Exposure Control Plan did not contain at least the elements in 29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii)(A) through (c)(1)(ii)(C): The employer did not ensure that the facility's written bloodborne exposure control plan contained elements as required in 1910.1030 (c)(1)(ii)(A) through (C) such as but not limited to: a) Documentation of annual review in that the last documented review was dated October 26, 2009; b) Identification of safer needle devices used in the facility and documentation of annual review in that the last documented review was October 26, 2009; c) Identification of the "appropriate disinfectant " to be used in the event of a blood spill; d) Identification of the medical facility to seek treatment in the event of a blood exposure.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 621112)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339953481.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.