Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SURFACE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SURFACE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. in 4010 VELP AVENUE, GREEN BAY, WI 54313 (NAICS 337110). OSHA activity number 340360072.

Watch Surface Technologies, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Surface Technologies, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4010 VELP AVENUE
City
GREEN BAY
State
WI
ZIP
54313
Mailing
4010 VELP AVENUE, GREEN BAY, WI 54313
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337110
Employees
14
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1360.00 · Current $1360.00
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:  a)    On or about 2/11/2015, the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program to protect their employees who wore tight-fitting half face respirators and filtering face piece (dust masks) voluntarily.   All provisions of 29CFR 1910.134 (c) through (m) must be covered in a written Respirator Program.  Key elements include, but are not limited to the following:      1. Employee Training.     2. Medical Evaluations.     3. Recordkeeping.     4. Program Review.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1360

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    a)    On or about 2/11/2015, the employer did provide medical evaluations for employees that wore tight-fitting half face respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1700.00 · Current $1700.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  a)    On or about 2/11/2015, the employer was not providing initial lift truck training or refresher training for employees that operated lift trucks at the facility.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1700

1910.213 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(1): Circular handfed ripsaw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut:  a)    On or about 2/11/2015, The company was using a DELTA UNISAW with a missing hood guard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.213 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(2): Hand-fed circular ripsaw(s) were not furnished with a spreader to prevent material from squeezing the saw or being thrown back on the operator:   a)    On or about 2/11/2015, The company was using a DELTA UNISAW with a missing spreader.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.213 C03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(3): Hand-fed ripsaw(s) did not have non kickback fingers or dogs so located as to oppose the thrust or tendency of the saw to pick up the material or to throw it back toward the operator:   a)    On or about 2/11/2015, The company was using a DELTA UNISAW with missing anti-kickback fingers or dogs.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.213 R03

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.213(r)(3): The point of operation on combination or universal woodworking machines was not guarded:  a)    On or about 2/11/2015, the company failed to guard the point of operation for routers attached to Powermatic table saws. 3/8" router bits were sticking up above the table approximately 1 1/2".
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:    a)    On or about 2/11/2015, the company did not have a procedure in place for the periodic inspection of their energy control procedures.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a)    On or about 2/11/2015, the employer did not have a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View SURFACE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340360072.