Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: NUTRAKEY INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of NUTRAKEY INC. in 975 BENNETT DRIVE, LONGWOOD, FL 32750 (NAICS 311999). OSHA activity number 340703438.

Watch Nutrakey INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Nutrakey INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
NUTRAKEY INC.
Site address
975 BENNETT DRIVE
City
LONGWOOD
State
FL
ZIP
32750
Mailing
975 BENNETT DRIVE, LONGWOOD, FL 32750
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311999
Employees
19
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $960.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  a. Powder room - For the SLJ Series hopper system used for supplement operations, the employer did not provide an energy control program.  Violation observed on or about 6/12/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1904.7 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $400.00 · Current $240.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.7(a): The employer did not record workplace injuries and illnesses that would be considered to meet the general recording criteria, and therefore to be recordable, if it results in any of the following: death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness. You must also consider a case to meet the general recording criteria if it involves a significant injury or illness diagnosed by a physician or other licensed health care professional, even if it does not result in death, days away from work, restricted work or job transfer, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness:  a. For the work related injury that took place on 4/10/15, that involved days away and restricted work; the employer did not record workplace injuries and illnesses.  Violation observed on or about 6/12/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $240
  • — Z (O) $400

1904.39 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $400.00 · Current $240.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer did not report an in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye as a result of a work-related incident to OSHA within twenty-four (24) hours:  a. An employee sustained an amputation on 4/10/15 and the employer was aware of the amputation.  The employer notified OSHA on 6/8/2015 of the amputation.  Violation observed on or about 6/12/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $240
  • — Z (O) $400

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 19 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a. Plant - the employer did not have a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to chemical products such as, but not limited to amino acid powders.  Violation observed on or about 6/12/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 19 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a. Plant - the employer did not have hazard communication training for employees exposed to chemical products such as, but not limited to amino acid powders.  Violation observed on or about 6/12/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340703438.