Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DOUBLE D PLASTERING & HOME IMPROVEMENT SERVICES, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DOUBLE D PLASTERING & HOME IMPROVEMENT SERVICES, LLC in 914 NE 17TH WAY, FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33304 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 340747146.

Watch Double D Plastering & Home Improvement Services, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Double D Plastering & Home Improvement Services, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
914 NE 17TH WAY
City
FORT LAUDERDALE
State
FL
ZIP
33304
Mailing
2225 MCCELLAN ST, HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238310
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  On or about July 1, 2015 at the above addressed job site, employer did not have a competent person perform inspection of scaffold before each work shift, exposing employees to fall hazard of 16 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii)  On or about July 1, 2015 at the above addressed job site, employees performing stucco application were exposed to fall hazards due to working from a tubular scaffold that was not fully planked at the working level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.  On or about July 1, 2015 at the above addressed job site, employees that were performing stucco application from a tubular scaffold were not provided with fall protection in the form of personal fall arrest system or guardrails to protect them from 16 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.95 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00
29 CFR 1926.95(a): Personal protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, was not provided, used, or maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition it was necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation, or physical contact.  On or about July 1, 2015 at the above addressed job site, employees performing concrete plastering operation were not provided with gloves, exposing them to come in contact with Portland cement (Rinker Stucco Cement) that can cause skin irritation and dermatitis.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)  On or about July 1, 2015 at the above addressed job site, the employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program describing hazardous chemicals, such as but not limited to; Portland cement for employees performing stucco application.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340747146.