Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PRC COATING & RESTORATIONS, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PRC COATING & RESTORATIONS, LLC in 9375 EMERAL COAST PARKWAY, MIRAMAR BEACH, FL 32550 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340747724.

Watch PRC Coating & Restorations, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for PRC Coating & Restorations, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
9375 EMERAL COAST PARKWAY
City
MIRAMAR BEACH
State
FL
ZIP
32550
Mailing
7610 LAKESIDE DRIVE, MILTON, FL 32583
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4900.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.    a.  On or about July 1, 2015, on the northeast side of a 6/12 pitch roof of a commercial building, an employee working on the roof was not protected from a 9 feet 5 inch fall hazard by the use of a personal fall protection system.    b.  On or about July 1, 2015, on the north side of a 5/12 pitch roof of a commercial building, an employee working on the roof was not protected from a 9 feet 5 inch fall hazard by the use of a personal fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4900.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:    a.   On or about July 1, 2015, on the north side of a commercial building, the ladder used to access the roof did not extend 3 feet above the upper landing surface, exposing employees to an 9 feet 5 inch fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:  a.   On or about July 1, 2015, on the northeast side on a roof of a commercial building, a folding ladder was used as an extension ladder to access the roof, exposing employees to an 9 feet 5 inch fall hazard.  b.   On or about July 1, 2015, on the north side on the roof of a commercial building, a folding ladder was used as an extension ladder to access the roof, exposing employees to an 9 feet 5 inch fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Unsecured ladder(s) were used on surfaces that were not stable and level:  a.   On or about July 1, 2015, on the northeast side on a roof of a commercial building, an unsecured folding ladder was not used on a level surface, exposing employees to an 9 feet 5 inch fall hazard.  b.   On or about July 1, 2015, on the north side on the roof of a commercial building, an unsecured folding ladder was not used on a level surface, exposing employees to an 9 feet 5 inch fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340747724.