SPRINGFIELD, IL —
OSHA Inspection: MUNDS ENTERPRISES, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MUNDS ENTERPRISES, LLC in 2520 SOUTH GRAND AVE., SPRINGFIELD, IL 62702 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340920008.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MUNDS ENTERPRISES, LLC
- Site address
- 2520 SOUTH GRAND AVE.
- City
- SPRINGFIELD
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62702
- Mailing
- 109 S. MCCREERY AVE., SPRINGFIELD, IL 62703
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: Employees working on a commercial roof were exposed to fall hazards because the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to control and eliminate the hazards present at the job site in accordance with the OSHA regulations.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1600
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) Employees were exposed to fall hazards and a competent person had not performed frequent and regular safety inspections of the construction site to identify and eliminate the hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system. Employees were exposed to fall hazards while taping seams on a flat commercial roof and the employer did not ensure that appropriate fall protection was utilized.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Employees were exposed to fall hazards while taping seams on a commercial flat roof without appropriate fall protection in place and were not trained to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize the hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: Employees were exposed to a fall of approximately 14.5 feet when using an extension ladder to access a roof and the side rails of the ladder extended approximately 18 inches above the parapet wall.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. Employees were exposed to a falls of approximately 14.5 feet when using an extension ladder to access a roof and the side rails of the ladders extended approximately 18 inches above the parapet wall. The employer did not provide training for each employee that would have enabled them to recognize the hazards and provided them with the procedures to follow to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340920008.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.