Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: CHEMIPLASTICA, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CHEMIPLASTICA, INC. in 238 NONOTUCK ST, FLORENCE, MA 01062 (NAICS 325211). OSHA activity number 341590651.

Watch Chemiplastica, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Chemiplastica, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CHEMIPLASTICA, INC.
Site address
238 NONOTUCK ST
City
FLORENCE
State
MA
ZIP
01062
Mailing
238 NONOTUCK ST, FLORENCE, MA 01062
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325211
Employees
26
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 D03 I A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 26 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6057.00 · Current $3029.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 12901291

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(A): The employer did not complete a compilation of process safety information (PSI) pertaining to the material of construction of equipment in the process:  a) In the wet end portion of the facility at 238 Nonotuck Street Easthampton, MA: On or about September 22, 2016, the employer did not complete a compilation of PSI pertaining to the material of construction of the Formaldehyde solution weigh tank.  b) In the wet end section of the facility at 238 Nonotuck Street Easthampton, MA: On or about September 22, 2016, the employer did not complete a compilation of PSI pertaining to the material of construction of reactor tank #1.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3028.5
  • — Z (S) $6057

1910.119 D03 I B

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 30 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 12901291

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(B): The employer did not include all equipment that was part of the process on piping and instrument diagrams (P&IDs):  In the wet end section at 238 Nonotuck Street Florence, MA: On or about September 22, 2016, the employer did not include a sight glass in the P&ID and the sight glass was located between valves FSV30 and FSV31.  In the wet end section at 238 Nonotuck Street Florence, MA: On or about September 22, 2016, the employer did not include the emergency shut-off on the P&ID and there was an emergency shut-off in the "doghouse" near the Formaldehyde storage tank and near Mill #5.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 E03 VII

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 26 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6057.00 · Current $3029.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1290

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(vii): The process hazard analysis (PHA) did not address a qualitative evaluation of a range of the possible safety and health effects of failure of controls on employees in the workplace.  a) In the facility at 238 Nonotuck Street Florence, MA: On or about August 15, 2016, the PHA did not address a qualitative evaluation of a range of possible health and safety hazards of Formaldehyde exposure due to a failure of controls during Formaldehyde tanker truck bulk deliveries.  b) In the facility at 238 Nonotuck Street Florence, MA: On or about August 15, 2016, the PHA did not address a qualitative evaluation of a range of possible health and safety hazards of Formaldehyde exposure due to thermocouple failure and misidentification of the failure due to programmable logic controller (PLC) logic issues.  c) In the facility at 238 Nonotuck Street Florence, MA: On or about August 15, 2016, the PHA did not address a qualitative evaluation of a range of possible health and safety hazards of Formaldehyde exposure due to a high temperature condition of the reactor prior to the introduction of melamine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3028.5
  • — Z (S) $6057

1910.119 E05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 26 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1290

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(5): The employer did not establish a system to promptly address the process hazard analysis (PHA) team's findings and recommendations.  In the facility at 238 Nonotuck Street Florence, MA: On or about August 15, 2016, the employer had not established a system to promptly address the PHA team's findings and recommendations for the fifteen (15) recommendations in the 2015 PHA revalidation in that the findings and recommendations were assigned target completion dates in the 2015 calendar year but the completion and the target dates were not tracked or updated.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 J04 I

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 26 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $12471.00 · Current $6236.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 12901291

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(i): The employer did not perform inspection and tests on process equipment:  a) The Formaldehyde above ground storage tank at 238 Nonotuck Street Florence, MA: On or about September 13, 2016, an external inspection (under the insulation) of the storage tank was not accomplished and testing of the tank was not performed since April 18, 2001.  b) The Formaldehyde weigh tank at 238 Nonotuck Street Florence, MA: On or about September 13, 2016, the employer did not perform inspection and testing on the Formaldehyde weigh tank in the wet end department on the third floor of the facility.  c) The Formaldehyde supply and return piping at 238 Nonotuck Street Florence, MA: On or about September 13, 2016, the employer did not perform inspection and testing on the Formaldehyde solution supply and return piping in the facility.  d) The wet end reactor at 238 Nonotuck Street Florence, MA: On or about September 13, 2016, the employer did not perform inspection and testing on reactor #1 in the wet end department on the third floor of the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6235.5
  • — Z (S) $12471

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $12471.00 · Current $6236.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:  In the Buttners Work industrial dryer at 238 Nonotuck Street Florence, MA:  On or about August 12, 2016, the employer did not ensure that fall protection was used by a wet end operator exposed to a fall hazard while descending into the dryer for the purpose of weekly cleaning.  The height of the of the dryer from the upper access hatch on the top of the dryer to the dryer drum hatch was five (5) feet and the height from the dryer drum hatch to the bottom of the dryer was sixteen (16) feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6235.5
  • — Z (S) $12471

1910.146 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7572.00 · Current $3786.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(1): The employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces were permit-required confined spaces:  The Buttner Works industrial dryer at 238 Nonotuck Street Florence, MA: On or about August 15, 2016, the employer had not identified the industrial dryer as a permit-required confined space and the dryer contained a five foot (5) and sixteen foot (16) fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3786
  • — Z (S) $7572

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $6057.00 · Current $3029.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8870

29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:  The wet end section of the facility at 238 Nonotuck Street Florence, MA:  On or about June 30, 2016, the cable tray and control panel for the Wet End reactor temperature control system and Formaldehyde pump select control panels contained openings where electrical knockouts had been removed and not replaced.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3028.5
  • — Z (S) $6057

1910.1048 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1293

29 CFR 1910.1048(d)(2): The employer did not determine the short-term limit (STEL) exposure of employees who may have been exposed at or above the STEL:  In the wet end section of the facility at 238 Nonotuck Street Florence, MA: On September 13, 2016, and at times prior, the employer did not determine the STEL exposure of wet end operators while producing Formaldehyde and Melamine-based plastic resin.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 D03 III B 2

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 12901291

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(3)(iii)(B)(2): The employer did not implement a change schedule for respirators not equipped with an End of Service Life Indicator that would ensure cartridges were changed before the end of their service life:  In the Wet End section at 238 Nonotuck Street Florence: On or about June 30, 2016, the employer provided air-purifying respirators to employees working with Formaldehyde solution in the Wet End; however, two operators did not know that a change schedule had been developed by the employer to change respirator cartridges after every three (3) hours of use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View CHEMIPLASTICA, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341590651.