LUBBOCK, TX —
OSHA Inspection: MOSSER CONSTRUCTION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MOSSER CONSTRUCTION in 11613 VALE AVENUE, LUBBOCK, TX 79424 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341850089.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MOSSER CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 11613 VALE AVENUE
- City
- LUBBOCK
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79424
- Mailing
- 1722 33RD STREET, LUBBOCK, TX 79411
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s). The employer did not ensure employees engaged in decking work were provided a program with frequent and regular inspections and made by a competent person.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $2138
- — Z (S) $2138
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: The employer did not ensure employees performing decking work were trained to recognize and avoid unsafe conditions associated with framing work and exposed them to fall hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $3741
- — Z (S) $3741
1926.28 A
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.28(a): The employer did not require the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions. The employer did not require employees performing decking work to don personal protective equipment while working and exposed them to struck-by and fall hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $2138
- — Z (S) $2138
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,207 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: Employees working without hard hats were exposed to struck-by hazards while working on the ground level as other employees performed decking work above.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $3207
- — Z (S) $3207
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents. Employees engaged in framing work were exposed to struck-by hazards while operating pneumatic nail guns without eye protection.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $2138
- — Z (S) $2138
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2016
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $3,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). Employees engaged in framing work without fall protection were exposed to fall hazards in excess of six feet.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $3700
- — C (S) $3741
- — Z (S) $3741
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,207 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Employees performing framing work without fall protection were not provided a program to enable them to recognize fall hazards and the procedures to follow in order to minimize those hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $3207
- — Z (S) $3207
1926.1053 A02
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(a)(2): Ladder rungs, cleats, and/or steps were not parallel, level, and uniformly spaced when the ladder was in position for use: Employees performing framing work were using a job-made ladder that was not uniformly spaced and exposed to an unprotected fall to the concrete below.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $3741
- — Z (S) $3741
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed: An employee performing framing work was exposed to a fall hazard while working from a 10 ft. A-frame ladder that was leaned against a wall.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $2138
- — Z (S) $2138
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. Employees performing framing work had not trained to recognize hazards related to ladders and the procedures to follow that would minimize the hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $2138
- — Z (S) $2138
More inspections at Mosser Construction
View Mosser Construction's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341850089.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.